VG Neoprene Laptop Sleeve for Samsung 13.3 inch Laptop Models NP900X3B / NP900X3C / NP900X3A / NP53
Thought Out NAJA Steel Stand (iPod Nano 3rd generation)
SureFire M951-KIT02, Millennium Universal Incandescent WeaponLight with FM63 Infrared Filter, 65 Lu
Everything you need from it.
I'm very happy.Great light, excellent quality, to make it even more perfect, make sure you buy the LED bulb P60 replacement, it is 420 lumens and is light a miniature star its so bright????? The replacement led bulb including shipment will run you about $20.The incadecent bulb it comes with SUX. Trust me, when you get that upgraded bulb it will be the best light you have or will ever own.Bought this for my AR and it arrived ready to mount. Easy sticky side/ velcro side mounting for the pressure switch and easy to tighten thumb screws for mounting to the rail. Not a single scratch, color is good and my battery tester showed batteries had full charge. Light is super bright (which I didn't doubt it would be) and for the price you can't beat it except by maybe trying your hand on ebay bidding on something similar but I just prefer buying outright and the price was more than fair. Light also arrived on Saturday when it wasn't suppose to be here til the following Mon. or Tues. so that's an added bonus. Hope this helps.If you are wanting an awesome tactical light for your weapon, this is your light. Remember it's not a toy, you have to take care of this light and it will operate for a long time.
BoxWave TomTom GO 920 ClearTouch Crystal Screen Protector (Single Pack)
BoxWave DirectSync Dell Axim X51v Cable
60W Power Supply AC Adapter Charger for MAC MacBook 13" inch A1184 MA538LL/A US Plug
Buy 60W Power Supply AC Adapter Charger for MAC MacBook 13" inch A1184 MA538LL/A US Plug Now
Craig Wireless Netbook Android 2.2
This neat little device fits easily in my purse. It's perfect for checking e-mails, updating Facebook and Twitter, and doing some casual web browsing. Factory-installed applications include the Kindle app and Piscel Smart Office, which allows you to create and edit Word documents, spreadsheets, and Power Point presentations. (Note: for Smart Office, you'll need to insert an SD card) The battery life is comparable to a laptop's: 3-5 hours, depending on usage. It supports both wireless and Ethernet internet connections.
The manual that came with my netbook was limited: if you get one, be prepared to learn a lot of things on the fly. But considering everything that I got for such a low price, I'm not complaining.
Buy Craig Wireless Netbook Android 2.2 Now
need a couple of netbooks for the kids so they can access info for homework online these are easy to useRead Best Reviews of Craig Wireless Netbook Android 2.2 Here
An absolutely terrific tool! Connects to my Hi-Def big screen tv, to my pc or my Blackberry mobile as USB or to Charge or to Sync. Further, it screen-rotates and is a remote controller or Presentation device. This post repeats my reply to 'ES' low-star review. ES may have thought they got a 4.0, but got a 2.0 by mistake. So this review covers 'issues' for both. Too, B+N Kindle-Page reviewers really slammed this product. That was a B-I-G motivator for me to get the Craig. So, here are all user helps..."I don't work for RiteAid or Android I'm just a power user and like portable-gear.
Please reconsider returning this mere $80 so you end up with all the same problems after spending it's $350 colleagues' cost! This RiteAid Craig $80 install of Android 4.0 (or 2.0) has complainers in ebay, amazon, B+N all due to ... User Error. If you accidentally got 2.0 instead, check for auto-updates. The 4.0 version is visible on the box cover and is SO much more loaded (HDMI 3Dgaming Ethernet vid/cam 3usb card-reader etc with the Tablet only slightly varied).
1--Dropped connection. After install/link/connection, most pc's need a reboot. Netbooks are the same. All connecting is automatic beyond the user's first wifi 'install, reboot, wait a few seconds to let it initialize and orient.' No per-use action required ever (except you choose which wifi connect from your popup list you made from your ... library, coffee shop, home network, etc).
2--DOA. Dead after 3 hours use happens when users omit either rule: charge 4 hours before using, or, you'll damage the battery if you charge it over 24 hours straight.
3--Keyboard/Mouse Speed. The 'Settings' includes a keyboard speed adjustment, if you use an add-on mouse, your mouse's software has adjustable settings.
4--File transfer problems, for anything beyond wifi you can resolve it through downloading (free) ES File Explorer in the Android's numerous bundled free apps.
5--Web access fails. Using the provided Browser app, and (if at Starbucks for example) keeping that wifi connect screen layered beneath your work keeps your connection (at Starbucks etc) valid and intact. Android (not Craig) set up all the apps you need, so going round about ways won't necessarily compute (esp w/ remotely wifi).
6--Total fail. Android is google-based. You need a google account (free).
7--'Cheap' command structure. Welcome to Android it's identical to their mobile phones. Don't blame RiteAid or Craig. "did not work at all. very very very very cheesy. was not working at all. never charged. quality is very bad
Hausbell (TM) Mini H7 2.4GHz Wireless Entertainment Keyboard with Touchpad for PC, Pad, Andriod TV
1)the price is half of what the others cost
2)its does the job...It does all that I want a mini wireless keyboard to do.
That is all...I dont write much reviews...but this is a steal for the price. XP and Windows 7 is just plug and play , no driver installation needed. The key baord is big enough so you can type with minimal mistakes. There is a reason why this product is getting all 5 stars..it works well..it works really well for the price.
I especailly like the pad...on the let side, you can navigate the mouse, on the immediate right, is a cool scroll feature...Any issues, I will try to update here.I needed something smaller than a wireless keyboard and mouse for the couch and my newly constructed pc theater. for the price and the features this is the best deal. It comes with a receiver the size of a thumb nail and a cord to charge the device. If you want the maximum range be sure the receiver is plugged into a front usb port. The red transmit LED (that lights up everytime a key is pressed or the touchpad is used) should be either dimmed or moved to the top\side\back of the device. I don't need to see it light up this often it is annoying. Other than that the clicking sound of each key press isn't to bad it's actually quite comforting. I would not get this device if you're going to be doing anything other than adding convenience for light use but that doesn't mean this device doesn't do everything a normal wireless kb and mouse does. It has custom buttons and media buttons. With Windows xp and 7 it required no additional software downloads. Plug and go. Thanks for the awesome product.Just received my unit. Packaging was sturdy, manual wasn't the best translation but not bad, the keyboard itself is PERFECT! It's light but sturdy and feels good in my hands. Plugged the adapter in my linux (zorin os 6) netbook and it works fine right off the bat. No set up, installation, or fuss. Touchpad is responsive and even the special function keys all work. I highly recommend this for any htpc or casual use setup!I bought 2 of them to replace 2 wireless mouses at home, both behave equal so it's not a faulty item, My laptop is located on a desk at my bed's footer, 8' away from me with direct line of sight.
They are very inaccurate, once I press an special key (alt, shift, control) it will not work but also wont release it, for example: if I press ctrl-c to copy it will not work, will not paste later, but if I press F it will fire the find function (as pressing control-F).
Normal keys (letters and numbers, etc.) simply stop working for no reason, fr example: I turn it on, logon to a web page, then later (without pressing any special key) when trying to write again, normal keys wont write, worst: turning it off and then on wont fix it.
In a letter inside package the seller or manufacturer offered "a USD$10 gift" if I give it 5 start feedback, now I understand why, be aware of positive reviews.It works on everything I've tested it on: Antique Dell 370 with XP, Raspberry Pi with Openelec, and a new HTPC with Win 7 HP. If my toaster was web-enabled, I believe I could control that, too.
Pros:
1) It just works!
2) Excellent battery life.
3) Comfortable, rounded edges.
4) Very light-weight.
5) Excellent RF range.
6) Multi-mode operation (once you figure it out).
7) Firm (almost too loud) button clicks.
Cons:
1) The touchpad has a grainy, almost sand-papery texture. You'll either llike it or you won't.
2) The LEDs are too bright.
3) Extremely sparse documentation.
4) Automatically shuts off after 30 seconds to conserve power (I keep my left thumb on the Fn key). With the battery life this has, it's really unnecessary. Also makes the Charge LED rather pointless.
Other thoughts:
Obviously, it's not perfect. If you're have RF range problems, think I-Phone. The most difficult media for RF to penetrate is water. Your body is predominantly water. Try holding it differently. If I cup it with both hands, the range falls off drastically and the keyboard gets squirrelly. But while I was giving it an initial charge, it paired up with the dongle from 60-odd feet away through a brick wall. I'm looking for the firmware. If/when I find it, I'll post a link here. If someone else finds it first, I'd appreciate the same. Just a few tweaks and this thing would be a five star item.
EDIT: I just couldn't resist, so I took it apart. It uses a trace antenna that's on the extreme upper-left as you're looking at the keyboard. I wanted to know what the pinhole in the lower-left was for. Some similar models must come with a microphone. There's a place molded into the plastic for one, but no microphone.
I wouldn't hesitate to recommend this over the candy-bar style. Unless you just want a laser...
NeatReceipts Mobile Scanner and Digital Filing System - PC
For starters the quick scan center with the new version takes less system resources and it allows the user to enter receipts in batches, which is efficient. I was able to scan a pile of 277+ receipts in one night, while watching television. Pretty painless and easy to do without requiring a lot of attention, so you can make good use of downtime while you're watching TV / relaxing, etc.
The best part of this is not the physical scanner, it's the software. It allows me to look up previous receipts in a jiffy, and lets me shred / toss old receipts. The physical scanner is nice too though. It's definitely not photo quality, but that's not why I bought this package. The scanner works fairly well / quickly for most receipts, a bit better than the silver version even though they're supposedly the same hardware. I find with the older version the USB would fail to be recognized by Windows XP, but no such problems with the new version.
If you want to organize your receipts and keep good records, I highly recommend this package! It's the one of the few products that actually does what it claims to do. Excellent product.
Future improvement wishes would be speedier scans, but that is limited by the scanning technology and hardware specifications.
FYI yes it will sometimes have difficulty scanning very light receipts, but that is to be expected with a scanner like this. If one expects photo quality scanner this is not the one to buy. A photo quality scanner will take too long to scan receipts. This scanner captures receipts information pretty well but it does not produce a photo replica of the receipt.
Also, the other reviewer mentioned problems with USB. Quite often that is a problem with Windows, especially on a Windows system that's been run for quite sometime and with a lot of other accessories installed. I installed this on 3 of my windows XP systems and they all worked fine. If I ever have a problem I would reinstall Windows as Windows tends to get cluttered with hardware profiles and have problems with USB devices.The ratio of bad reviews to good reviews here on this NeatWorks scanner was dubious so though I desperately needed a receipt-scanning solution, I really hadn't taken the plunge until I visited Costco and must've been riding a wave of positive-ness because I walked in, wasn't looking to buy anything, but when I saw only 2 left of this product on the shelf, I took one.
Got home, inserted the set-up CD as instructed and nothing. I'm running a new (1yr old) Dell with very sufficient hardware/memory running WinXP. But I figure sometimes the CD set-up is wonky, so I ejected then reinserted and it worked; brought up the set-up initialization screen. It asked me to check online for a version newer than what was shipped; I did, and there was. So after 10 minutes of downloading a 200mb file, I was done. Clicked the file, set-up was a snap (took 10-12 minutes) and off I went. Connected the scanner by USB cable and everything worked; no crashing.
Tested a batch of 15 receipts to see if it could handle the crinkled, faded, potentially illegible imprints on what seemingly is the standard thermal paper being used by all merchants. Alas, this product worked fine; and it worked as promised. Scanned all receipts, and was able to make not only the correct (99% of the time) OCR function for amounts, dates, retailer, and sales tax, it also was able to be relatively correct in judging which sector of retail (general receipt, food, etc.) it should categorize my purchases.
So the initial test was done; I was pleased. So now I wanted to dig deep and scan roughly 6 weeks of receipts that I'd amassed -roughly 200 receipts. This would've really been a test, since half of these receipts were nearly 4-6 weeks old, they were crinkled from being shoved into my pocket or folio while on the road, and some were teeny-tiny receipts like taxi receipts from Manhattan.
Result? Got through it all, and except for roughly 5 receipts out of my total 197, the scanner and software were both able to recognize most receipt fields and categorize them correctly. Oddly, and I think this is because of the clarity of the receipt vs. software, some receipts were ported into the "Documents" category vs. "Receipts" area. That was remedied easily by dragging each image from "Documents" to "Receipts."
"Areas," you ask? The software gives you 3 distinct areas that it will move your raw scans into; those are RECEIPTS, DOCUMENTS, and BUSINESS CARDS. I'm guessing the software takes ques from the content plus the size of the scan to determine where images should go. Like I said, the software was mostly correct except for a few faded receipts, but when I moved those stray images from "Documents" to "Receipts," the software kicked-in and was able to read the proper field information (amount, etc.) correctly.
From these areas, you can then file your raw scans into varying folders that you can create, or into document types if you'd like to export as PDF, etc. It's pretty simple, and I have never used a product from NeatWorks, so I have no way to compare previous versions with this 4.5.2 version that I'm using.
I looked at negative reviews and can say that I have neither had the software or hardware cause crashes, reboots, stalls, freezes, or any other degradation of my laptop from working as it normally does.
Also, I had no real OCR problems with the scanner or software recognizing figures or names. In fact, the only constant problem I had was with drugstore chain "Longs Drugs" which uses only a logo and not typewritten version of its name on receipts, so the software took to recognizing the first item in my receipt as the name, so I had numerous prescription receipts filed as "Hallmark" since I had bought cards with those purchases. What amazes me is the software is able to decipher through all the cr*p that's listed on receipts; these days, surveys, serial numbers, and other gobbledy-gook are all listed and yet the software was able to filter through that and report the correct field information.
A couple cautions: 1) Handwritten numbers have never been recognized in any of my scans, 2) Export data to Quicken in groups based on the accounts you use in Quicken.
As to #1 above, those who have a lot of written-in totals at restaurants for tip, etc., will find this problematic. Every receipt I'd gotten for a meal (which were a lot) I had to correct with the tip included vs. the software recognizing only the subtotal before tip.
And as to #2 above, I found that importing into Quicken was a snap (as QIF file), but since Quicken will only dump all data in a QIF file into a single account, you need to filter this BEFORE the export. For example, if you use multiple cards like I do for various clients and you keep track of each account separately in Quicken, then you'd better categorize those purchases in NeatWorks accordingly, and then selectively export those transactions. That way, your import into Quicken is done per account. It's easier that way, than having to use the "Move Transaction" function in Quicken.
I'd say 4 stars because I had no elements of surprise and no hiccups in service. I'd rate it 5 stars after about 3-6 months of ownership if this flawless experience keeps up. I'll be back in September to report.
Buy NeatReceipts Mobile Scanner and Digital Filing System - PC Now
(NOTE: see my update on NeatWorks ver 5 below)I have been using NeatReceipts for a couple of years now. I generally like the product, but I am now using BOTH the 'Classic ver 1.5.9" and the new Ver 4.0 software because NeatWorks broke a covenant with its' early adopters. They broke two of the cardinal rules of product development (1) never, ever, under any circumstances forget your early customers and their data and (2) never remove vital features from the product.
First, they "forgot" their "Classic ver 1.5.9" users. Versions of the software from 2.0 up thru the current ver 4.1 cannot recognize or import any of the receipts or documents scanned into the earlier version. I have personally talked to them about this for almost 2 years. At first, in early 2007, they repeatedly stated that they were hard at work on a migration solution. We depended on that statement, telling them how important it was for us to be able to access our archived data for inventories, insurance and tax records.
But they finally just abandoned this effort and offered everyone a discount to upgrade to a later version. How is that going to help with restoring archived data? The data and file formats for their .elrec and .eldoc seem fairly simple a scanned image and some recognized text fields. Why can't they import those formats like they allow for jpeg and tiff images?
They offered no acceptable reasons beyond that we are no longer working on that feature and "would you like to upgrade?". They seem oblivious to the frustrations they have caused a large number of their early customers. We even communicated with Rafi Spero, one of the companies owners. If he couldn't make it happen, you know they don't care about you as a customer. BEWARE THIS COMPANY.
Secondly: The "Classic" version allowed users to create folders and subfolders, etc. This was a fantastic way to organize receipts for cash, various credit cards, checks and debits, by year and then by month. Or to organize a copy of receipts for an inventory by broad categories and then further by store, year or vendor. So the initial features of both subfolders and the ability to copy receipts from yearly tax records to inventory folders was extremely useful and helpful in elimnating paperwork clutter.
The new ver 4 software does not support nested folders or copying receipts to other folders. Every time you scan a receipt, it goes into a folder. But all folders are on the same level. You can show and hide folders, but this is an extremely clumsy process and causes users a lot of extra work in trying to organize their invoices and receipts. If you want to copy a receipt, you have to scan it AGAIN. How brain-dead is that?
Bottom Line: This company has proven that, at their convenience, they will ignore or abandon prior versions of the software and remove vital features.
To fix some of their current short-coming, as mentioned above, it would not surprise me to see them create a new version of their software that is incompatible with what they are selling today.
DO NOT TRUST them with any vital data that you may need in the future.
UPDATE: 2-11-2010 I have been given a preview of the new NeatWorks ver5 software. I don't know when it will be released but it seems to have (finally) added back in some of the features that went missing with ver 2 and onward. Now they also have a chance to allow for importing old receipts (".elrec" files) from their "Classic" users. If they do Import ".elrec" files many Classic users will be happy that their data is no longer "orphaned". I will then change my opinion and rating of NeatWorks and their products because they did admit to these past mistakes, listen and respond to their customers and "the true test of your character is how you respond to those mistakes."
Read Best Reviews of NeatReceipts Mobile Scanner and Digital Filing System - PC Here
Neat Receipts is a great idea and concept. But the moment you start to really use it disappointment will set in.The portable scanner works fine. You have to feed the receipt in with a loving delicate touch. I can live with this. Here is the problem. Initially when you do not have much in the library, you can scan and process receipts as fast as you can feed them. Great. BUT, once your library starts to build up, it can take up to two minutes for the program to open and I average about one receipt scan per 1.5 minutes. No kidding.
When you read the Neat Receipts' response to the army of pissed off Mac users they simply acknowledge it doesn't work well when you get more than 900 items scanned and it is our responsibility to not have more than 900 items in our library. Come on Neat Receipts. Any average consumer or average business person makes more than 900 purchases in a year. They expect you to split off your library and create a multitude of sessions. This is a lame diversion from their software engineers fixing the problem.
So, what is their solution, just like the PC vs. Mac ads where PC spends more money on promoting/advertising the product instead of fixing it in R&D.
Mac users, YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED. Stay away from this sinkhole of a money pit.
I am now looking at Mariner's Paperless software. Their features and compatible scanners are listed below. Most scanners are already compatible with this software.
Want NeatReceipts Mobile Scanner and Digital Filing System - PC Discount?
I bought mine from Costco.I had my frustration with the calibration. But after the 2nd calibration, everything works fine. I figured I didn't push the calibration card all the way in enough on the 1st try.
I didn't have any of the connection problem with the USB port. I immediately scanned in my piles of receipts that I've saved up for a few years, mostly Costco & Home Depot.
It scanned all my Home Depot receipts beautifully, everything was captured. Ironically, the one that has the most problems are the Costco receipts. It won't capture the vendor's name and the date. But it allows you to manually put that in. 90% of the receipts didn't have that problem.
To my surprise, it can scan in any form of receipts, not just the skinny ones. For example, all the 1-page repair receipts from the auto dealership and mechanics, it can scan it with no problem at all.
The best part is now I have peace of mind, knowing that I can find my receipt when I NEED to. I know I can throw away my Costco receipts since they have very liberal return policy but I'm not sure if I can throw away the Home Depot ones since they are such a pain in the )( to deal with.
The only disappointment I have is that it only captures the total expense and tax, it doesn't give you the break-down.
All in all, it's a very useful product it does solve one of my headaches in life.
Greatshield Ultra Smooth Clear Screen Protector Film for Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 7-Inch Tablet (3 Pack)
rooCASE Super Bubble Neoprene Sleeve Case for Acer AC700 Chromebook 11.6-Inch Laptop (Black / Orang
Original LCD Screen Display for HTC TOUCH HD T8282 Blackstone ~Replacement Repair Parts
Acer A700 Folio Case, Stand, Cover for Acer Iconia Tab A700, A510 10.1" (Black)
Buy Acer A700 Folio Case, Stand, Cover for Acer Iconia Tab A700, A510 10.1" (Black) Now
Ordered this for my 11 year old sons for their tablets. They are just ok. Not the best material or styling. There are some holes that don't line up with anything, but the camera hole is adequate. There are some extra hole opening to nowhere. It is sufficient for young kids. It does protect the tablet well. If you are looking for something real stylish with nice materials this is not for you. Clumsy design and materials are kind of cheap and on the heavy side as well. Great for kids though for a few years. Unfortunately, there are not that many to choose from to fit this Acer tablet.First off, I didn't purchase this case, it came with the used Acer Iconia I bought. So, its been used, but I don't think my issues of it relate to that.It holds the tablet well, and when closed its comfortable. When I got it it had some fraying on the sides and a couple of loose threads, but I have no idea what the previous owner did to it. (Although, the tablet is in pristine shape.)
However, when using the stand, I always have to stop, take a second, and slide the flap into the little lip in the back. I can't do this without looking, and it usually takes two hands (one hold the back flap, one holding the lip open to slide the flap in). That gets old quick.
My main issue with the cover is that it hurts my hands. Trying to hold the tablet in my left hand in portrait mode with the flap around the back is just plan uncomfortable. I am a lady and my hands are small. Since there is nothing to hold the flap folded back, I have to squeeze pretty hard with my hand to keep things from sliding against each other or coming unfolded. After a while that cramps my hand.
Overall its a decent looking case, and for someone with larger hands, or who intends to lap hold it I think its good.
Want Acer A700 Folio Case, Stand, Cover for Acer Iconia Tab A700, A510 10.1" (Black) Discount?
Diamond Multimedia AMD Radeon HD 6670 1 GB GDDR5 Video Graphics Card Dual Link DVI / HDMI / Standar
Golla G731 Riley Light Gray Smart Bag
Tascam DR07 Portable Digital Recorder
- Built-in Stereo Electret Condenser Microphone
- Records to SD or SD-HC Card Media
- 2GB SD Card Included
- USB 2.0 Jack for Transferring Files
- 3.5mm Stereo Mic Input
pros:
great price ($175 guitar center)
small
light weight
records any combination of 16/24bit 44.1k/48k sample rate
has built in mics
very easy to use
takes SD cards to expand recording time.
records either mp3 or wave files.
sound is directional, and records the best from directly in front.
Comes with a wind screen.
Takes AA batteries, easy to find and use.
cons:
Mic pre-amps are VERY noisy: when recording an interview or acoustic guitar, you can hear the hiss through it... lots of hiss on low volume recordings like that.
Lots of handling noise (more on that below),
NO Speaker! So you have to bring headphones to check your recordings.
The windscreen looks and feels cheap, its just a piece of shipping foam cut out to fit on top.
Buttons feel cheap,
memory card and USB access door feels cheap, I'm sure after a short while of use, it will break off.
Handling noise: any slight touch of the unit make a loud sound when using on-board mics, Poor quality limiter: the limiter cuts back so hard that when you just touch the unit, or get a loud pop from your voice, it cuts all the way down to zero, and then back up, so you get this very dramatic but short cut out of sound. Its very annoying. I had to turn off the limiter to use it, because every time i touched the unit to move it, it would cut out for a second. This was during an interview where I had the recording level up.
I was doing an interview and had to set the internal mic sensitivity to high and the gain to 8 or 9 (out of 10) just to get a good level on my subject sitting about 6 feet across from me. There was a lot of noise (hiss) too. Too much for someone picky, and looking for clean sound. Maybe an external mic would have been better, but you're still using the internal pre-amps which are very noisy.
I have to say that for the price, if you are looking for something to record band rehearsal, practice, or song ideas, its perfect! Maybe if you had a pair of mics you would get good results from a live rock concert (rock, not jazz or classical, because of the hiss in the background.... the rock music would drown that out)
So 5 out of 5 because it is perfect for what it is, but its not a solid feeling professional piece of gear with high quality preamps, its just a portable recorder for every day recording... professional sound guys would be disappointed. I would recommend this to my musician friends who want something to record scratch song ideas while away from a real studio, or someone looking to get into recording as a hobby, and play around with recordings.
Hope that helps people out there.
*** UPDATE ***
okay, i just found the Sony PCM-M10 Portable Digital Recorder. I would suggest that anyone on the fence about the Sony PCM-D50 should consider this one, its half the price. If its ANYTHING like the D50, it will be something to consider if you're looking for a bit more from the DR07, mainly a bit more in quality of the mics.
PCM-M10 Portable Digital Recorder
Buy Tascam DR07 Portable Digital Recorder Now
I finally have this fine little solid state recorder in my hands, and I must say it does nearly anything I could want from it.Sound quality, especially using the 44.1KHz/48KHz and WAV16bit/WAV24bit settings, is as good as you can get without having to fork over considerably more for something more professional grade, such as the Sony PCMD50 (~$500) or a far more expensive device (sorry, forgot the name) that costs $1,500USD.
As expected, the integral microphones are decent for recording up close, but I would definitely recommend using an external for recording bands, lecture halls, or other roomy areas where the sound source may be some distance from the unit.
That is also where this little gadget really shows its stuff, as it is configurable for condenser microphones that require a powered (think "phantom" power) jack, dynamic microphones that have their own power source (I have an Audio Technica stereo mike that uses a single AA battery to operate), and even a line in jack for recording from a mixing desk or other device with a line out jack.
You can even slow down or speed up the recordings after they are made, with no pitch change, although I did notice that the slowed recordings exhibited noticeable artifacting at the slower settings, but that is no real problem, as that feature is mainly a musician's tool for learning how to play a fast or complicated part, NOT for listening enjoyment.
The 2GB SD card that it comes with almost has the full capability of file size that this unit can handle, which is 2GB, or ~3hours and 24minutes when recording 44.1KHz/16-bit.
The 2GB card holds just over 3 hours, so anyone wanting to max out the recording file size limit will need a 4GB card.
In fact, that 2GB file size limit is the only possible area of concern for anyone using this, at least if you want to capture a lengthy performance in lossless WAV format.
I did not experiment with the on-the-fly MP3 recording it does, but if you set it to 128KBPS, you can expect over 10 times as much recording time, due to the compression ratio.
Of course, the batteries would likely give out before that ~30 hours of nonstop recording, so anyone wanting to do that would be advised to buy the Tascam AC adapter also sold here.
Oh, I also LOVE the ease with which Tascam made it to set the levels, where you simply hit the record button once, which turns on the microphones without starting recording, allowing you to listen on headphones to adjust those levels, then hit record again to start the recording.
So simple, even a young kid could do it.
As a suggestion, I would advise anyone wanting to use this for recording from a distance to purchase a decent condenser omnidirectional "lapel" style stereo microphone, with the little Griffon unit being a particularly nice one, especially for the money.
I can't wait to really put this through its paces.
***EDIT***
Update: It turns out that this handy little recorder neatly circumvents the above mentioned 2GB file size limit by simply automatically starting a new audio file once it reaches that 2GB limit on the first file, continuing on until the SD card is full, or if you press stop.
This means that you will be able to record approximately 53hours 20minutes onto a 32GB SD card!
Naturally, the way to handle the multiple files created on the fly by this recorder is to append all of them in order on your hard drive, naturally using an operating system whose file system has no such 2GB limit, which includes XP and Linux, among some others.
I have also been able to test this little gadget, and I am quite happy with the performance and quality of the recordings.
The interface is intuitive, and the controls are quite easy to use, even those for dividing files directly on the unit, which makes it quite handy for slicing off removing trailing garbage on recordings, which can then be deleted before downloading the saved portion of audio onto your computer.
Slick, great sound quality, small, and yes updateable.
Yes, there IS a small firmware update out there already for this that addresses some minor issues, and the update process is quite easy as well.
I definitely appreciate a manufacturer making their hardware updateable for future-proofing their products.
I feel perfectly comfortable in giving this five stars, and I would have given it six, if Amazon had that rating available.
GREAT solid state recorder!
Read Best Reviews of Tascam DR07 Portable Digital Recorder Here
The DR-07 does everything Tascam claims and more. It's easy to use and the recordings sound great. Used it the day it arrived to record an entire 5-hour band rehearsal. Setting it up was simply a matter of putting it on a music stand across the room and pressing REC. I never had to touch it again for 5 hours. The stereo 128K MP3 audio quality was fine and the resulting 5-hour file used only about 300MB of the 2GB (2,000MB) SD card that came with the DR-07. Took it home after rehearsal and quickly transferred the MP3 to my laptop where I sliced and diced the recording into individual song files with CoolEdit 2000. At last there is an easy way to remember how we played it at rehearsal and do a quick review before the gig. This thing is a must for an aging rocker.Other great musician features include:
adjust tempo without affecting pitch
adjust pitch (in half steps) without affecting tempo
fine tune pitch (cents) without affecting tempo
quickly mark a phrase (short or long) and loop playback infinitely
use line-in for quick and easy board tapes
camera style tripod mount
It lived up to Tascam's claim of 7.5 hours on two AA's. That may seem like a long time but I'm probably going to do the planet a favor and buy the AC adapter. I'd also like to find a reasonably priced carrying case to keep the display from getting scratched up in my gig bag.
Want Tascam DR07 Portable Digital Recorder Discount?
I shoot documentaries in HDV widescreen and with surround sound. For surround, I use the tape to record the front two audio channels from a Sony stereo microphone. For the rear two channels, for the past few years I've used a Sharp Minidisc recorder mounted on the rear of the camera, fed from an identical Sony stereo microphone facing rearward. The rig has worked great.But the Sharp Minidisc recorders, reliable as they have been, are mechanical, with spinning disks and moving heads. It was time to move up to solid-state.
I looked at a variety of compact flash-memory recorders. Prices ranged from $175 to $500. I decided to get my feet wet with a unit at the lower end of the range, and narrowed my search down to the Zoom H2 and the Tascam DR-07.
The Zoom unit looked and felt delicate, though reviews on this site and elsewhere were positive. Still, when I got my hands on the Tascam it was "Game Over" for me. The unit looks classy and well-built, the menus are expansive, the audio quality is first-rate, and even the external mic preamps are just as quiet as the ones in the Sharp Minidisc units (and the noise level when driven by an Audio-Technica AT-822 for serious choral recording is plenty low enough to be masked by hall ambiance).
Two AA cells run the thing for many hours, and Enerloop rechargeables will no doubt increase that by 50%. No proprietary flat rechargeables for me, thanks. Pushbuttons are first-rate, and are not the Zoom's membrane type.
Connect the thing to your PC with a standard USB cable, and it shows up as just another hard drive. Drag and drop your files to or from the unit. And they transfer fast--a one hour wav (~700MB) took about 2 minutes. You can also just take out the SD chip and transfer with a conventional reader, if you want. Note to Apple and others: this is how things should be done--generic cabling, generic file formats, maximum flexibility.
Chip can be any size, including 32GB. Wow; 50 hours of continuous 44.1 wav recording. 500+ hours of mp3 recording.
All in all I'm a very satisfied buyer. Imagine, for under $200 you can buy a recording device with specs that would have been considered state-of-the-art 20 years ago.
UPDATE 8 Jun 09:
CAUTION CAUTION CAUTION CAUTION
The Tascam shares a fault with the Zoom H2 (and perhaps all other solid-state inexpensive recorders)--when you are recording from an external source, the incoming signal apparently goes through a stage or two before the level is adjusted by the level control dial on the side of the unit. In other words, if you bring in a hot signal and expect to control it by just turning down the recording level dial, the signal will nonetheless overload the first stage(s) it passed through and will clip.
I spent some time trying different setting and arrived at this empirical observation: if using the mic in port, the sensitivity (high-med-low) setting MUST be set so that the level adjust on the side is at least "5" (the dial is calibrated from 0 to 10). Any less and you're guaranteed a signal that will be clipped. At a "5" or greater the full range of the scale on the display can be filled before clipping. At a "4" setting, the signal will clip if greater than about -12db.
I still love the device, but this is in my view a design error. A signal that doesn't hit the end of the display scale shouldn't be clipping, regardless of the setting of the recording level dial. As mentioned, this is apparently a common issue across different products, but still should be fixed.
I don't know if this issue affects the line-in port. I assume it does, but have not been able to find a line-level signal strong enough to require a "4" setting.I bought a Tascam DR-07 , while I was looking for an MP3 player, that records from microphone and line-input as well. It uses SD cards. Sadly there is no AC-adaptor included. So I bought a universal device which I setted to 5 V. It is very lightweight and fits into any pocket. I transferred some MP3's to the card via my PC and put the card back into the DR-07. I hooked up the DR-07 to my Rodec mixing device and the result is simply fantastic ! The output is very distortionless and noisefree. Via a serious headphone, the result is also very good. I did some recording from the built in stereo microphones and this is also very very good... simply professional ! I also did record from the line input socket, and this result is also very good, allthow a larger Solid State or cd-recorder will give better results. (which is normal).
The unit has a handy "lock" knob , that prevents unintentionally pushed buttons... There is no built-in speaker. This is maybe a drawback for reporters that use it as a microphone recording device.
As a pure mp3 player , for which I initially bought this unit, it is an incredible performer... and you can change the SD-cards, so I have an unlimited number of possible tracks in my reach.
The overall audio quality of this small unit is simply stunning !
Price/performance ratio is very high. Thank you Tascam.
rooCASE Neoprene Netbook Sleeve Case Cover for Acer Aspire One AOD255E-1853 10.1-Inch Netbook Sands
iPazzPort Wireless KP-810-16A 2.4Ghz 3 Axial Gyro Fly/Air Mouse Mini Keyboard
Anyway, the keyboard works and is not too bad.
Buy iPazzPort Wireless KP-810-16A 2.4Ghz 3 Axial Gyro Fly/Air Mouse Mini Keyboard Now
This product is very good but they still can improve it a little more, I think.I'm still learning about all its features.
I'm using it with and Android Box for my HDTV.
If you don't want to expend too much, this is a very good option.
HP iPAQ 5450 Color Pocket PC
On the positive side, the device is fast, with outstanding pocketDIVX video performance and a sustained 2MBPS WLAN transfer rate (10 meters).
Bluetooth performance is deceiving, in spite of that, the concept of personal area network is quite interesting. But if you want to exchange some MP3s, you can expect transfer times that are comparable to the infrarred connection ones not much gain at all.
We often have to soft reset our devices, mainly due to WLAN config changes those are not reflected, or WLAN card not properly turned off, or WLAN reconfig not possible or rejected by the device. We certainly think the 5450 is not a mature product. Great concept, state of the art microelectronics and so on, but we think HP released a beta version, not a final release. An expensive one, indeed.I agonized at the tough choices I had to make: A) Stick to the Palm pilot series which I had been using for the last 3 years; B) Buy the HP 3950, the top model in the 3000 series; or B) Buy the new HP 5450.
The Internet reviews of the HP 5450 were a mixed bag with some people stating that it wasn't a reliable machine, some going as far as saying that they had to make a hard reset every day.
I bought my HP 5450 about a month ago. Overall, I have been positively surprised by it's reliability. Many of the negative points stated in the December/January reviews have been dealt with efficiently by HP. For example the headphone jack on my machine is a standard headphone jack. With a 128 megabyte SD memory card, I have been using the iPaq as an MP3 player with no problems. The finger print reader works impeccably, always on the first time scan (I did have to practice for about 20 minutes using the training program supplied with the machine as you need to use a swift steady motion). The fingerprints are now saved in the ROM of the machine so that even if you do a Hard Reset (i.e. restore the machine to it's original configuration), the machine is still protected with you finger print. This makes your machine useless to any "would be" thief.
If you take the backlighting down to a reasonable level, you easily get 7 to 8 hours of battery use. I have a second battery which I have been using when I travel. I also have the option of charging the machine when I go on long trips as there is a standard adapter which allows you to plug in your power cord straight into the Ipaq (instead of through the cradle). There is also the option of slow charging directly through the USB chord so you could leave your power chord behind without being left completely stranded.
Both Bluetooth and WLAN connections work fine and are relatively easy to set up if your phone and wireless gateway are properly setup. They do use up more battery, especially the WLAN. I turn them on for a few minutes when I need to get/send my emails and turn them off when I am done.
There is also a nifty backup software which allows you to backup all the RAM contents into ROM (the Ipaq file store) so that if you go on holiday, you can backup all your programs and databases to restore them later in case your memory got erased due to an extended "power outage".
Size and design are exceptional. Only a little bit bigger and heavier than my previous Palm m515. The Windows Pocket PC 2002 software is even more user friendly than the Palm OS.
Please note that I bought my Ipaq in Hong Kong where it comes with a 1250Mh battery as standard. It seems that Amazon's is only 900 Mh.
A great machine... Well worth its price!
Buy HP iPAQ 5450 Color Pocket PC Now
I'm a diehard Palm fan and still am. However the PocketPC filled an itch that I have never been able to scratch with the Palm namely web browsing.With the 5450/5455 I have been able to (within an hour) hook up to my WIFI system in my house, setup wireless synching and get up and browse the web. Something that I think would have taken multiple steps with my Tungsten.
Here are the things I like and dislike about the 5450/5455:
LIKES:
1. Integrated WIFI The wave of the future. No need to slap add-on cards or boards to the unit. It is all built in.
2. Color screen Bright and readable.
4. Active Synch Everything you enter to the unit can be automatically synchronized to your computer as you work -not just when you hit the synch button.
DISKLIKES:
1. The early 5450/5455 have intermittent problems with WIFI "Out of Memory" error messages.
2. The battery life is shorter than Palm-although I AM using the WIFI capability so will live with it (and I'm sure that is why the battery depletes faster).
Overall I am a little sorry to say that after a month of usage I CANNOT recommend the iPaq for anyone but the most diehard enthusiast. The device is wildly buggy on WIFI (reported in just about every iPaq discussion forum, requires numerous soft resets ever day and frequent HARD resets (ie All data gone bye-bye).
After about a month I've found this platform to be buggy, slower than Palm and just not as convenient. It does not break any new ground whatsoever for the average user. And to top it all off, the web browsing that I loved initially turns out to be dog slow -even when connected wirelessly to my DSL. Avoid this product.
Read Best Reviews of HP iPAQ 5450 Color Pocket PC Here
I bought the device as my first Pocket PC. I couldn't get over all the integrated features, integrated 802.11b AND Bluetooth, consumer IR, etc etc. After I got the device and spent a few days playing with it, I started noticing a few quirks with the integrated 802.11b. First of all, every once in a while, when attempting to start the wireless network utility to turn on the wireless radio, I will get an error stating there is not enough driver memory. This is easily resolved with a soft reset of the device, but isn't something I should have to do in the first place. Ah well, that wasn't too big of a deal to me. Second, it uses the Atmel controller, and if you are looking for wireless network stumbling utilities like Ministumbler or Pocketwarrior, they will not work with it until they are ported for this controller. And last, being the biggest gripe about it, there is no integrated 802.1x authentication support, and I haven't found any 3rd party solutions. This basically means that if you plan to use this device in your place of business and 802.1x authentication is required to access your corporate WLAN, you'll have to get an expansion sleeve and a supported card and drivers. HUGE oversight on HP's part seeing as this device seems to be geared toward the corporate market. If your WLAN at work doesn't require 802.1x, you'll be fine. I hope that this will be resolved in a future software update, but for now you might be better getting the cheaper 3900 series, a compact flash adapter sleeve, and appropriate compact flash 802.11b card, especially if you plan on using this device for wardriving or connecting to an 802.1x secured network...[Supplement on 1-24-2004]
I still have the iPaq and am happy to say all the issues I complained about are resolved. The open source PocketWarrior program is available for wardriving with the Atmel chipset wlan chip built in. And with the Windows Mobile 2003 software upgrade you can purchase from HP, the device gets 802.1x support. New gripe, sometimes I have a hard time getting the device to sync via the supplied cradle, and have to revert to using a straight USB sync cable. This happens on TWO cradles I have. Sync issues aside, I love this thing! Upgrading rating from 3 to 4 stars...The unit DOA less than 3 months. At first, the price was great but now it sit as a paper weight on my table. If you see this item for less than what it used to be, forget about.
JustCase Simple Smart Ultra Slim Polyurethane Folio Stand Smart Cover Case for Apple iPad 2 -Orange
it covers the whole iPad, front and back. And the price is not even
half of it. It fits the iPad 2 so well, and the open to all ports are
precise. The cover works exactly like the smart cover. You can roll it
up into a stand. It's got the same auto sleep/wake feature when you
close and open the cover. The available colors from this seller
matches the smart cover too, although it does not matter much. It's
really light, which is also good since half of the time, the iPad is
used by my 5 year old kid.
Pros:
Inexpensive
Got the same feature as a smart cover
Covers the whole iPad
Cons:
Very difficult to put in and take out, so be prepared to use it most
of the time.I ordered this for my iPad two after using what seemed to be a similar case at work. I chose green and the color of the item was about the only thing that was really spot on in what I wanted. I was looking for something with a slim profile that added little bulk to the iPad but acted as a stand for Skype. When this arrived, it was quite flimsy and I immediately was hesitant to even take it out of the packaging. The way the case is constructed, the polyurethane sleeve that you slip the iPad into has edges that were fairly jagged (look in the grey image for evidence of that) and added a god 1/4 to 1/2" of material to the iPad which also meant it did not function in it's stand well. The magnetic cover, while it did work to turn the iPad on/off, was really flimsy and did not hold well in any position. The case felt cheaply made, which it is an incredibly inexpensive case, so this it so be expected. It was just more like fabric than I would have liked and added a bit too much too the iPad for my liking. I did end up returning the case. I wouldn't really recommend it I would suggest looking for a case with a snap on cover that is a hard plastic in the back my case now has that and works a lot better than I think this case could have both in protection and functionality.Well, this is not a smart cover, and the price is less than half of it, so it won't be fair to compare it to an Apple smart cover. It does its work protecting both the back and front. It's got the smart cover features of folding into a stand in two angles, auto waking up the iPad when you open the case, and even the color match the smart covers. I really like the colors, which Apple probably spent quite some time to choose.
The material of case is very anti-slippery, it's ultra thin, and it's hard to take out. I agree with others, it is a kid-proof case. I bought an orange one, which made my daughter grin.I loved this cover when I first got it. It is lightweight and I love the "smart cover" features (turns the iPad off when it's closed, turns it on when it's opened). The orange color wasn't as bright as the photo on Amazon, but it is still pretty, kind of like an orange cream popsicle.
The main improvement I can think of would be a small, secure strap to hold a stylus.
Unfortunately, this cover isn't holding up very well. After only four months, the part that rests around the front of the iPad2 is getting a bit loose. The edges are actually fraying just a bit, which I find unusual for the silicone-type of material that this seems to be made from. I'll keep this cover for now but am searching for one that will withstand the wear and tear of my many-times a day use and occasional use by my kids.Having owned the original iPad and case, this one has been a disappointment. When folding the flap over to the back of the iPad, the magnets shut off the iPad and it's very annoying. I would have to disable that feature.
The fit is far from the original iPad case. I couldn't take it for more than 4 days, took it off and got a different case. Not worth shipping it back.

