LG Original OEM Horizontal Leather Pouch Case for LG Incite CT810

I purchased another Leather Pouch Case for my LG-CT810 Incite cell phone, only to find out that it doesn't fit when you have the protective case cover covering your phone (it goes in but the magnetic fold wont close over it). So if your using a case cover on your LG Incite phone, you will need an origonal Leather Pouch Case from LG to fit it...this one is great!

Read More >>

GSI Transfer Camera Connection Kit - CF Compact Flash Memory Card Reader - Download Photos-Videos F

Did not work in my iPad2 with my Duracell 16gb CF Card from a Canon 7D. I had hoped it would work, it would be wonderful for those few times you need quick access to a picture.

Got the reader yesterday in the mail. Simple packaging, and not much in the way of instructions.... But, being a guy, I don't read instructions anyway...

On my first attempt, the reader wasn't recognized, and when, on my second attempt, I tried to transfer pictures I had uploaded to a CF card from my computer, the iPad 2 couldn't find them.

I went back and tried again, taking actual photos on a 8Gb CF2 card with my Nikon D200. Worked like a charm

Apparently the first time, I hadn't put the files into a folder that the iPad could find and recognize.

It imported my .NEF files perfectly, and iPad displayed them just fine!

Good job guys.

Buy GSI Transfer Camera Connection Kit - CF Compact Flash Memory Card Reader - Download Photos-Videos F Now

I was really excited about being able to use this so when I plugged it into my iPad and it worked, I was incredibly pleased. Then a few days later when I went to use it again. Nothing. I tried several times and maybe every now and then it would show the "Camera" tab but nothing appeared.

Read Best Reviews of GSI Transfer Camera Connection Kit - CF Compact Flash Memory Card Reader - Download Photos-Videos F Here

Easy connection to upload photos directly to iPad from CF card. Just plug and play. No installation required or instructions needed.

Want GSI Transfer Camera Connection Kit - CF Compact Flash Memory Card Reader - Download Photos-Videos F Discount?

Read More >>

Tech Armor Google Nexus 7 Tablet Premium HD Clear Screen Protector with Lifetime Replacement Warran

PROS: This screen protector is a great fit for the nexus 7. It is thick and easily applied.

CONS: However, it attracts EVERY fingerprint. Everytime you touch the tablet it makes a mark. I have to clean it with a microfiber cloth SEVERAL times a day otherwise I can't see the screen with all the fingerprints in the way. Another issue is the application sticker, it doesn't peel off. You have to purchase a sticker removal solution to get it off, and I wasn't happy to have to put that gooey stuff on my tablet.

I plan to do some more research and purchase a different screen protector to replace it. The sticker is a one time annoyance, but the fingerprint issue is constant. I uploaded a picture of my tablet with it on.

I bought this as I was buying my Nexus 7 online. It's not a matte type screen protector, but a clear transparent one so it's not going to reduce glare on the screen. Application was easy just like any other touch device screen protector. Remember to wear gloves or at least wash your hands real good before handling screen protector as to not get finger prints on the under side when applying.

Buy Tech Armor Google Nexus 7 Tablet Premium HD Clear Screen Protector with Lifetime Replacement Warran Now

I bought the three pack for my two nexus 7's. I purchased the tablets for my kids for Christmas this year and I'm hoping the screen will hold up to 5 year old use. It was easy to apply and fit the screen well. Everything lined up. Update 4 months later: great product still holding strong.

Read Best Reviews of Tech Armor Google Nexus 7 Tablet Premium HD Clear Screen Protector with Lifetime Replacement Warran Here

I got the 3 pk thinking i would mess up at least once but it went on easy just make sure the screen is clean cloth provided, and try not to touch sticky side. I only had a few weeks but it dorsnt have a mark on it i have it in a leather sleave and its a neat unit all round 2 thumbs up

Want Tech Armor Google Nexus 7 Tablet Premium HD Clear Screen Protector with Lifetime Replacement Warran Discount?

This screen protector was much easier to apply than others I've used in the past. It's invisible and the touch response hasn't changed. I am very pleased!

Save 68% Off

Read More >>

2GB CF MEMORY CARD Pentax Optio 230 330GS 330RS 33L 330 430 Camera

This memory card seems to be working fine. It was promptly shipped in good condition when ordered. I can find no problem with the buying process or the value of the memory card.

L Steelman

Read More >>

Optoma PK102 PICO Pocket Projector

OK I can't believe I am the first to review this little guy. I got mine yesterday and have been very happy with it. If you read carefully, it does everything it says it will in the specs. It was packaged great, and included three adapters one VGA, one USB, and one composite video and audio cable.

It was brighter than I expected and easily hooked up to my laptop running Vista with no problems. The included Video Encoder worked as advertised (though I am not sure why it can't just play standard MP4 video...) and photos loaded fine. The interface is very intuitive.

I did purchase a cheap tripod (~12 bucks) with it and I am glad I did this thing is so small it would be hard to get it pointed exactly right without.

Let's face it this isn't great for someone working on a projector all day every day you need better resolution and more lumens. But for the average geek at home this thing is perfect. For occasional use with laptop, or videos, or just still photo slide shows.

The unit was even smaller than I expected when I got my hands on it. To say it's the size of a cell phone is no exaggeration.

For a $250 this is one gadget you might consider in your arsenal!

I ordered this and the 3M MPro 120 to compare them, and for me the MPro was the better choice. The menu select wheel on the Optoma seems to be very tempermental (hard to select what you want) and in a bad location relative to where the unit connects to the computer. I had this connected to my MacBook and I had to manually change the display resolution to get the projector to work. The final straw for me was that the internal storage and video player a GREAT option if they can get it to work for Mac users requires a proprietary video encoder that you download to your computer that didn't seem to want to install on a Mac with Snow Leopard OS.

The Optoma is smaller, cheaper, and brighter than the 3M projector, and I do like the styling of the unit better than the 3M projector, but if you're a Mac user you may want to consider other options.

Buy Optoma PK102 PICO Pocket Projector Now

Product shipped fast and was properly packaged it's very small and handy and charged up nicely. That, however, is about the only decent thing I can say for this. The picture quality was terrible! I cannot stress this enough. I had to black out the room entirely which is not practical for using it to give a sales presentation obviously and even then the picture was blurry, washed out, and small.

Folks, this product needs a lot of work to get it up to snuff. If I could have given it zero stars I would have done so happily. Don't waste your money on this. I'll have to wait another few years before I attempt this again. Darn shame too because I need it bad. I returned the ones I purchased to Amazon.

Read Best Reviews of Optoma PK102 PICO Pocket Projector Here

come at this device with realistic expectations and you will not be disappointed. i got it to use in a dark room to play last-generation videogames (PS2), watch DVDs, and watch streaming videos off the net. i am mega happy with it. i put mine on a gorillapod, and you'll probably want to do similarly

Want Optoma PK102 PICO Pocket Projector Discount?

I bought this projector with the intention of watching movies from my computer on my bedroom wall. In theory it should be a great product, but in actuality it is far from it. There are several reasons I gave this product only one star.

First, it is not Mac compatible even though the web site says that it is. The projector can project from the Mac (by mirroring the computer display), but data cannot be transferred to the projector so the on-board memory is completely worthless. The company says that data needs to be converted to Xvid format via their proprietary software that is only for use with PC. Videos already encoded as Xvid will not play.

Second, the battery life is very poor. I was not able to watch a single (approx 8o minute) movie on it freshly charged.

Third, it is very cumbersome only being able to use the projector connected to both the computer (would not work through the included USB and VGA cables, need to buy an additional DVI adapter to get it to work at all) and plugged in. Even with the tripod, it was very unsteady and difficult to get it a straight projection.

Fourth, the projection quality was very poor. Even though the room was dark, the darker shots in the movie were impossible to see. I was not able to enlarge the picture to my desired sizeabout 42". The largest size I was able to project to with a clear picture was about 25". Even at this small size, the picture was not as clear as I would have expected. I was not able to get it to focus clearly on text at any size.

Lastly, the "owners manual" is virtually non existent. None of the literature that comes with the product is very useful in operating the product.

Read More >>

rooCASE Netbook / iPad Carrying Bag for Samsung NC110-A02 10.1-Inch Netbook Gloss Blue - Deluxe Ser

Just opened (before wrapping) to check this out, it is very cool, has lots of pockets for storage a nice padded area for the iPad, nice size, this is going to replace an ugly heavy portfolio, I think he will love it!

Save 40% Off

Read More >>

Sleek Impact-Resistant Cover Case with Accessory Genie Stylus for AT&T HTC One VX

works fine and easy to put on and is very sleek it doesn't add any more weight to the phone

Great case for this phone. Underestimated the product initially and just picked up a quick case without digging too deep and was very surprised with this. Great finish and fits really well to the phone. Keep up the good work :D

Buy Sleek Impact-Resistant Cover Case with Accessory Genie Stylus for AT&T HTC One VX Now

This case is light weight, fits well, slips right on and off and looks nice too. Great for the price and a very simple, sleek case.

Read Best Reviews of Sleek Impact-Resistant Cover Case with Accessory Genie Stylus for AT&T HTC One VX Here

I bought this for my husbands new HTC smartphone and he loves it. It makes the phone so easy to hold and hang onto as the HTC One VX is extremely slick. The stylus is perfect as he has really fat fingers.

Want Sleek Impact-Resistant Cover Case with Accessory Genie Stylus for AT&T HTC One VX Discount?

While all the openings line up alright, there is a strip along the bottom of the phone that is not covered by the material. Either it was not designed right or I got one where the mold was not quite full or something. It certainly does not fit as well as the one in the photograph. I find it hard to believe that it is by design since it looks stupid with that strip of the phone showing.

Save 90% Off

Read More >>

Acer Aspire V5-171-6675 11.6-Inch Laptop (Silver)

Acer made a good name for themselves by providing reliable desktop computer components, and that reputation carried over when several years ago, the company advanced into providing laptops. Now after owning three of them, I have never been disappointed in the operation or reliability of any of them. This one is very small and solidly built and it has a brushed aluminum finish I really like in contrast to the nice shiny metallic finishes usually associated with Acer laptops.

So now we enter into a new era of Tablet computing and Windows 8, and it is a definite change from the previous computing we learned so well. Advancing cautiously with the help of Acer's desktop, Windows eventually revealed that it is still the same old Windows inside with a new graphical sugar coating and some new enhancements that make it very appealing for use with the new Touch Screen Tablets that are steadily gaining in popularity.

Windows 8 has your back if you still find better use for a computer than a Tablet, so this Acer has the familiar touchpad mouse built into its keyboard, but I still prefer using a BlueTooth mouse whenever possible. Additionally, many Android users may find Windows 8 is very similar to using the data provisions of their cell phones, complete with an endless number of available apps.

This little 11.6 inch wonder in electronic wizardry will always remain readily available whether I am at work or travelling. Sized the same as the newer Tablets, I consider this laptop to be better provisioned, and best of all, it sells for about half the price of a top-rated Tablet. It is provisioned with the least expensive version of a set of three new CORE Intel processor configurations that increase in cost at each level of complexity, but really don't provide enough in additional abilities to warrant a higher price over what I already have in this very basic laptop computer. This i3 runs very cool and is built into the smallest laptop frame Acer provides, and I even have a little accessory carrying case for it.

This laptop is too small to accommodate a mounted optical disk drive, but that is easily fixed since there are several external CD/DVD RW drives available at a nice price, all provisioned to plug into a laptop's USB ports for immediate use. Regardless, Acer Support provides a Recovery Flash Drive for this computer that can be plugged into one of its USB ports if a recovery to factory specs ever becomes necessary.

With a little more time researching some of the other similar laptops available from Acer before purchasing this one, chances are I would have also seriously considered the Acer Aspire One laptop. That would have saved another couple hundred $$ since it is a very close duplicate to this one. The only real difference is its slightly slower Intel processor, but it also has a smaller but more practical 320 Gig hard drive, which for all my needs is still HUGE. Either one of these laptops is perfect for students who must store and do their work on a fully provisioned computer, and there are also some AMD provisioned 11.6 Acer laptops as well at an even lower price.

This is a nice, solid, basic laptop. I've only had it for about a week, so can't speak of its longevity. Physically, it is very solid. I've noticed some laptops out there have a little bit of wiggle in the screen or keypad, but this one is solid, which is impressive for being so small and thin. They keyboard is easy to type on for me, but I have tiny hands... my larger-handed husband has some trouble, but its not his laptop. The mousepad is OK, I would prefer dedicated left and right click buttons rather than pushing the pad itself for this, but I'm getting used to it. There are a lot of USB ports for being such a small computer. I also appreciate that the screen is very clear and bright... so bright, I even had to turn it down. The screen is also wide-screen, so even though the laptop is 11 inches, it is almost just as wide as my 15 inch... I was concerned it would be difficult to read being so small, but this was not the case. The sound is weird, the speakers are on the bottom of the laptop, so if its on my lap, my lap mutes a lot of the sound... when its on a hard surface, its fine. But, I don't plan on using the speakers, I use headphones if I ever REALLY need to listen to anything anyway. Its no bother for me, so it wasn't a negative, but others might find that info useful. The computer was super easy to set up, its processor is VERY fast, websites pop up quickly. I personally don't like Windows 8, but there were plenty of websites out there (CNET mostly) that helped me download some free programs to bypass some of the annoying Windows 8 features (start screen, start menu, hot corners, etc.)... but this is to no fault of the laptop. Solid laptop and a great price. Highly recommended.

Buy Acer Aspire V5-171-6675 11.6-Inch Laptop (Silver) Now

The laptop is great when plugged into a wired network, but is honestly hopeless on wifi.The wireless card drops internet connection every 5 or so minutes, and sometimes it comes back on its own, sometimes you have to open and close the wireless adapter, sometimes you have to reboot the laptop to fix it. I have two other laptops in the same room, a dell and an asus, both work great on wifi without problems. The wi fi signal is great. I have looked online and read a few reports, wifi problems appear fairly common with Acer laptops with this qualcom wireless adapter.

Because I purchased and installed office on this machine, I am now stuck between a rock and a hard place. I can return the laptop for credit and lose the $120 I paid for office because I have to buy a new copy, or I can keep the laptop without working wireless. Some choice that is! 2 stars is generous. Dont buy this laptop if you need reliable wi fi connection.

Read Best Reviews of Acer Aspire V5-171-6675 11.6-Inch Laptop (Silver) Here

Okay this is a pretty capable little notebook computer. The i3 CPU will make it considerably faster than the older generation Intel Atom chips. The quality seems decent for a $450 part.

Now here's some information that can save you some grief:

1. The BIOS is set up from the factory so that you can only reach it from the Windows 8 environment. I spent the better part of an hour trying different keys and combinations in a futile attempt to reach the BIOS aggravating. The following is courtesy of user "gr8stapeoftx".

From the Windows 8 Sidebar:

Settings

Change PC Settings

General

Advanced Startup

Restart Now

Troubleshoot

Advanced Options

UEFI Firmware Settings

Personally, I don't like this setup. I Like the Bios to be agnostic of the operating system. What happens if someone decides to downgrade to Windows? Fortunately, once you reach the BIOS screen from Windows 8, you can set the bios to work in legacy mode. After that, the F2 key will get you into the bios upon bootup.

2. Getting to the internals is incredibly easy. I think it is literally just one screw to remove the bottom chassis plate. Upon removing the plate, the RAM is a breeze to upgrade. There are two slots, and one of them is populated by a 4 GB chip. You can add another 4 GB chip for a total of 8 GB. Doesn't get easier than that.

3. Hard drive now this is much more tricky. If you are looking to replace the conventional hard drive with an SSD drive like I was, pay attention. Many of the SSD drives on the market will *not* work with this computer (Sandisk Extreme, Kingston, OCZ Vertex, Crucial M4, etc.) Why? Because they are all a tad too tall at around 9.5 mm. They must be of the 7 mm variety. The Samsung and Transcend drives seem to work because they are around 7 mm.

All in all, this is a pretty good computer for your money. I wish the battery life was more like 6 or 7 hours, but the battery is not sealed, so you should be able to buy aftermarket batteries down the road.

Want Acer Aspire V5-171-6675 11.6-Inch Laptop (Silver) Discount?

I am a college student, and the V5 is a perfect choice for me. the laptop is only about 2 lbs. I can hardly feel it in my backpack. The battery life is about 3 4 hours, I don't have to worry about bringing the power cord. For a 11.6 inch laptop it feels really good when I'm typing. The material that its made out of doesn't get dirty easily. The CORE I3 processor is amazingly quick. This laptop does more than what I need.

The reason why I'm giving it a 4 star is because I dislike Windows 8. it suites better for a Ipad, tablet or a smart phone, but it's a pain to work with on this laptop. The speakers are placed under the laptop, so to me the sound is a bit muffled. (I usually use ear buds, so it's not a problem) The battery is difficult to remove because you have to insert a small object (like a paper clip) into the release latch while your pulling it out.

Save 9% Off

Read More >>

rooCASE 2n1 Silicone Skin (Clear) Case Cover and Capacitive Stylus Pen for Motorola XOOM Tablet

• Non-OEM Case for Motorola XOOM Tablet
• Made of Anti-Dust Silicone Rubber Material. (Tablet NOT Included)
• Lightweight, Durable and Will Not Add Significant Bulk to XOOM. Has Openings for all Controls and Sensors.
• rooCASE Capacitive Stylus for Greater Responsiveness . Lightweight Aluminum Body; Weigh: 4oz and Length: 114mm. Convenient 3.5mm Audio Jack Attachment. Clip that Can Attach to Shirt or Pants Pocket.
• x1 Premium Silicone Skin Cover for Motorola XOOM x1 rooCASE Capacitive Stylus Pen

Great value for the money. The only down side is that after you put it on it blends with the color of xoom to turn gray. Not that clear, close the white. I stopped using it since am using the xoom speaker for charging (can't put it on speaker doc while its on.)

The stylus is the only thing an using constintly. Love it.

Save 86% Off

Read More >>

3Com Audrey Web Appliance

We have had our Audrey for about two weeks now. Our overall impression is a good one. The unit is sturdy and goes well with the decor in our kitchen where it is kept. The name is a bit odd, but you forget about it after a while. We believe that while it is not perfect, it is a good start for this type of product.

Installation is very easy and fast. Audrey was connected and running in a matter of minutes. User's guide is large and easy to follow. It is very non-technical. User's who have any technical questions beyond how to plug it in and set up a custome ISP will have to look elsewhere.

Browsing We did not purchase the Audrey for the purpose of browsing the internet. We thought this was a job better left to the computer in the upstairs office. Our reason for Audrey was to have quick access to email, a common shceduler, and a common address book. As it turns out we use it to surf a lot more than we ever thought. It really pales in comparison to using a PC for browsing, but the ease and speed of getting on the net, and the location in a central family place has caused a lot more use in this fashion than we ever expected.

EmailThis is where Audrey really pays off. Email that is simple,quick, and accessible. We have begun to really use email a lot more because of this. Audrey lets you know if you have email waiting by flashing. It has become second nature to look for the flashing light on Audrey just as we would our telephone answering machine. Email program is very simple and stripped down compared to outlook, but it serves its purpose and gets the job done efficiently.

Address and DatebookOnce again, simple and effective. Pick an email address from the address book, tap it, and up pops the email program addressed and ready to go. We find it very useful to have all this information located in one central area for the whole family to use. Audrey will sync to two different palms, but we haven't had a chance to try this feature yet.

Nothing is perfect. We have had a few problems with our unit. Twice it has locked up after an automatic download and left the modem connected until we arrived home in the evening. We only have one phone line in our home, so this could present quite a problem if someone is trying to call and leave a message. There are also channels that are updated online and then you are able to view these without connecting back to the internet. It is only fully successful here about half of the time. We are able to get the weather channel on all occasions, but things like ABC News, ESPN, and CBS Marketwatch are very unreliable.

Overall we are very pleased with our purchase. It serves our needs well when we want it to, and fits nicely in the background of the kithen when not in use. We purchased Audrey over the other choices of web appliance because it was smaller and you are able to choose your own access/email provider. No regrets at all. The only caveat that we would add is that we didn't buy this appliance as our only source to surf the net. If that had been the case our choice may have been different.

My family purchased an Audrey for the holidays. We plugged it in and got it set up. Set up, by the way, couldn't have been easier. We just hooked up th broadband adapter and turned it on. Set up took roughly 15 minutes. After that, we set up all the porgrams. Thge internet works great with one problem; NO JAVA SUPPORT! The other problem we had was that our Palm V's wouldn't sync. We had to reboot to get it to work. It's a good product for what it does. Now some of the less "techy" people can acsess the net with ease. However, 3com shouldn't have rushed it, cuz she has her quirks.

Buy 3Com Audrey Web Appliance Now

For some unknown reason, 3COM discontinued this web appliance only 5 months after it was released... so forget about getting support from 3COM... they no longer support this device and have even pulled support information from their website. The good news is that there is an entire on-line community devoted to customizing, tweaking and personalizing this web appliance.

I originally got this for my mother as an easy intro to the Internet. There is a wireless keyboard which works well, but it's a bit too small for adult human hands to type quickly with accuracy.

The stylus (when not in use) sticks in the top of the Audrey like a single antenna and it blinks green when a new e-mail has arrived.

You can surf the web and even view Flash movies as long as they are reverse complaint to 3.0 Flash viewers. To protect itself from malicious programs, the Audrey does not read Java, but it will read JavaScript. The underlying OS (operating system) is QNX which is like a mini flavor if Unix. Because it isn't some proprietary OS just for this one appliance, there are many support forums for QNX which allow you to further update this appliance.

My less than perfect rating comes from the fact that Audrey prefers to be on a LAN connection, whether it's DSL, Cable Modem or a company LAN... as long as the connection is on at all times. If you disconnect from your ISP and turn Audrey off, she'll turn herself back on in an hour or so (whenever she feels like waking up) and start calling your ISP.

There have been a number of times I've been talking to my mother on the phone when Audrey suddenly decided to wake up and send modem screeches on the phone while we were talking.

I currently have the Audrey in my home as I try to customize it by hacking into the shell and keep Audrey from behaving this way. In order to customize Audrey, you need to have a router (like the Linksys 4 port available here on Amazon.com) so you can spoof an IP address to make Audrey think she's connecting to 3COM when in fact she's connecting to another address to update her OS so that the shell can be accessed.

Without the hacking, Audrey can still serve as a great appliance. The touch screen isn't really meant for human fingers, but the stylus with it's soft rubber tip. You can connect to most "normal" ISPs with the exception of AOL, which uses a proprietary browser and can't be loaded into the Audrey. Currently, my Audrey is connected through Earthlink. If you're already a wiz at the Internet, this appliance will probably drive you nuts, but if you have a parent or another friend who is totally clueless and scared of computers, this is a fantastic intro to e-mail and the web.

The Audrey boasts 2 speakers and a microphone built-in as well as a note pad and calendar.

For the money, this is a very sophisticated device... and the fact that you can synch up your palm pilot to it is remarkable.

The Audrey has an internal modem and has a jack for your phone line as well as for an Ethernet connection and a single USB port so you can connect a printer.

The Audrey is light weight and takes up a very small footprint on a desk.

Read Best Reviews of 3Com Audrey Web Appliance Here

I opened the box a scant few hours ago and I'm already in love. Sure, the keyboard takes some getting used to (it's kinda small) but the stylus and touch screen more than make up for it. It comes in five yummy colors (I opted for the creamy green). As for storing you data and syncing with your Palm ... top notch. And since Audrey updates herself daily I can only hope for more cool add ons.

Want 3Com Audrey Web Appliance Discount?

The Audrey mainly worked, but Java and Realplayer pages don't work. Realaudio is OK, so it makes a great web radio. Email is OK but some attachments don't get through. Audrey is a great prototype, but it's not ready for prime time.

After many calls to 3com support I still couldn't get a Palm V to sync with it and so they decided that the serial port was faulty and asked me to return it for a replacement. That was four weeks ago! Calling their customer service is an adventure it's patchy at best. I'd wait for them to get their act together. Leon

Read More >>

PDair Aluminum Metal Case for BlackBerry Bold 9700 (Silver)

This is a really nice case. Durable, soft on the inside to protect your equipment, and it has screen protection. The only flaw is that there is significant space around the openings for buttons and inputs, so dirt can get in. However, the device is easily removed to clean it off. I ordered from PDAir directly and it took forever, but maybe Amazon can do better.

Read More >>

Ace Apple Ipad 2 Bold Standby Case for Ipad 2, Black

nice feeling, look great, and comfortable with handle, difflicut to drop when I hold it with my hand. I like it, what more do you want me to say?

A quality, sturdy product. Other covers look great online but are pretty flimsy. Love the auto-sleep and wake feature. Can also easily access all the buttons, connections and cameras.

Buy Ace Apple Ipad 2 Bold Standby Case for Ipad 2, Black Now

Read More >>

Corel WordPerfect Office X6 Standard

So many operations can be done in WP in one or two keystrokes that take many more than that in Word. The full justification in WP is much better than Word, with truer justification so that there are no noticeable spaces between words. Very flexible program, not only for word processing, but legal documents, greeting cards, posters, resumes, etc. are much easier to do, either with built in templates or self formatting. One of the most valuable operations in WP is the ability to reveal codes to see exactly what has been done to your document and to fix things if necessary. Another is the ability to write simple little macros, quick words and quick correct to save keystrokes. very quick and easy convert to PDF and other formats. I do miss the compose feature from earlier versions, but still have high regard for the program which I have been using, in all its manifestations, for over 30 years.

I have been a WP user since the DOS days, and have regularly upgraded the product as new versions come along. Until the last version (WPX5) and MS Office 2010, I would never consider looking at MS Office as an alternative. Unfortunately, WP has compatibility issues that it struggles with, and MS Office 2010 finally has put out a product that a professional can work with, so the line between the two products is getting blurry.

WP still excels at professional formatting and ease of operation. MS office gets tangled up in its own fancy formatting, and cannot easily move text from one document to another (or from one format to another) without failing on formatting. You cannot beat WordPerfect's "Reveal Codes" as a way to clean up formatting clutter!!

WP X6 is trying to adopt MS Office 2010 functionality and not succeeding While I like multiple windows (rather than working with multiple documents within one frame), WPX6 loses its "recently opened" file list if you don't open every file from within X6 completely missing the opportunities afforded by Windows 7 to search and access files from within WIN7.

MS PowerPoint is the leader in the slide show market. With the exception of the inability to automatically create random transitions (a weird shortfall, IMHO), the ability to create, organize, flow, embed video and sound, set slide transition timing and export to a video format have turned PowerPoint into a very nice all-purpose media tool. By comparison, X6 Presentations is clunky and awkward.

The respective spreadsheets from X6 versus MS2010 are true to their roots both maintain their native codes and formatting. Because I "grew up" with Quattro Pro, I have never liked nor gotten used to Excel I can move much faster in QP simply due to familiarity.

Unfortunately for WP, I seriously considered NOT upgrading from X5 to X6. The only reason I decided to spend the money is in hopes of seeing some compatibility issues and file-handling awkwardness fixed. Sadly, that didn't happen in X6, so I cannot think of a reason to upgrade from X5 to X6, and I may never purchase another upgrade.

MS Office service lies in its extremely robust and user-friendly knowledge base and the well-rounded user forums. I have never had trouble figuring out how to do something in MS Office a simple online search generates multiple options.

Corel suffers in the service department they have a typical knowledge base that is not very user-friendly, and a very annoying call-in support line (assuming you don't have to pay for it). If you require hand-holding, X6 is not the product for you.

As a professional, I have used Open Office (no longer supported by Oracle or Sun Microsystems, but let loose in the wild as an open source platform), MS Office and WordPerfect Office. I use Word Perfect for most word-processing, PowerPoint for all slideshows, and use Excel and Quattro Pro somewhat interchangeably, depending on what I'm doing and what I might be starting with. For a new user, I recommend MS Office as the most "newby-friendly" software. For a professional or experienced user, I recommend X6 as the software that yields the most professional results with the least amount of time fussing with formatting.

Buy Corel WordPerfect Office X6 Standard Now

WordPerfect Office X6 Standard is a good product at a fairly reasonable price. Easy to use and compatibility with MS Office is good, but formatting changes in conversion is still a problem. Some of the additional apps included are unnecessary, since you can download them free from the internet. I had a real problem with the VideoStudio Essentials X4 video editor the program did not install properly and after three attempts, I had to remove it completely since it caused my computer to crash each time it was opened. The templates provided are very basic and not very useful, but overall the word processor, spreadsheet, and presentations programs all work great. I would recommend this product for a home / small office environment it is a good value with reliable performance.

Read Best Reviews of Corel WordPerfect Office X6 Standard Here

Wordperfect is still the best of its type. It has those reveal codes, the "make it fit" function and other features that Word does not have. WP is still a full-feature product offering unique control over formatting and support for legal and complex multipart documents.

Want Corel WordPerfect Office X6 Standard Discount?

This regards specifically WordPerfect --I think very highly of the other programs in the suite, but my concern is the word processor.

I have used WP since the days of DOS, but then MS came along and by loading PCs with Word on it, a whole generation of new computer users automatically knew nothing but Word --and WordPerfect plummeted from being the world standard, to a small (but ferociously avid) market.

Simply to be using what everyone else was using, I tried three times to dump WordPerfect and force myself to switch to Word---and despite sticking with Word long enough to break through the "familiarity" theshhold, the more I used it the more I loathed it.

WordPerfect is so superior --control, versatility, interface, customability, everything --that it is a real shame that MS's manipulation of market forces has robbed most people from using it. And on top of everything else, it is a veritable bargain. I would give it seven stars if I could.

Save 24% Off

Read More >>

MOFI Kangaroo Pouch Case for Nokia E7, GREEN

I got this for my Nexus phone (original). It works great, and looks like a small muppet in my pocket. I'm considering glueing googly eyes on it.

BTW, even though the seller is in the UK, I got my MOFI in California in about a week.

Read More >>

Panasonic Lumix ZS20 14.1 MP High Sensitivity MOS Digital Camera with 20x Optical Zoom (Black)

I couldn't decide between these three cameras (and their variants, the Sony HX30 and the Panasonic ZX20) because many of the reviews of each made the cameras sound very similar. So, I went out and bought (from merchants who accepted returns) one of each of these three cameras (I didn't need WI-FI or GPS, so that's how I settled on these less expensive variants). And then I took photos and videos in various conditions. I am not a professional photographer, and I didn't do Imatest or any other specific tests on the images (you can read C/net for that), but this is an experience of a regular person who was taking pictures and videos with these three cameras side by side, which is a comparison that you do not often see.

The bottom line is that these three cameras are very similar with a few minor differences, but those differences set them apart and may make you decide that you like one more than the other.

Generally speaking, NONE of these cameras is a DSLR replacement. Whomever writes that the pictures are as good as a DSLR is not speaking accurately. Also, none of the cameras is a replacement for a high end camcorder.

OUTSIDE PICTURES

If you are taking pictures outside on a sunny day all of these cameras will take very nice pictures for small to medium enlargements (no bigger than 8 x 10). The cameras all produce nice fairly sharp images that would be well suited for that purpose. And, like most people, I don't remember ever enlarging a picture more than 8 x 10, so it is not a common problem.

What might be an issue is if you are zoomed in all the way and wanted to crop a photo (which sometimes happens), the differences in the way the cameras' photos look when you "pixel peep" might make a difference. In good light outside, the cameras were close, but the best photos were from the CANON with the SONY and the PANASONIC a close second.

INSIDE PICTURES GOOD LIGHT

If you are inside and you are taking pictures in low light, you will see a different story. Again, at smaller sized prints 4x6, 5x7, most people will see almost no difference between the pictures of the three cameras other than the PANASONIC's colors are a little less vibrant than those in the CANON and the SONY. I am not sure whether those colors are less accurate, they are just a little less vivid.

If you pixel peep at these pictures, the CANON's photos are clearly the best with the PANASONIC's being second. The CANON's remain very sharp through a good amount of enlargement while the PANASONIC's, although close, get softer a little faster. The SONY's pictures inside with good light became soft rather quickly and, I'm not sure if this is because the SONY has 18MP on a small chip (as some of the tech reviewers write), but there is a "watercolor" effect where after you enlarge it a little bit, it looks like a Claude Manet painting.

INSIDE PICTURES LOW LIGHT

In poor light, the hierarchy between the cameras remains the same, but there is less of a gap between the CANON and the PANASONIC. It seems as if the CANON takes somewhat worse pictures in low light, and the PANASONIC just doesn't get that much worse. As a result, the gap between these two becomes somewhat closer. The SONY's pictures remain the poorest of the three in low light.

VIDEO OUTSIDE GOOD LIGHT

All three cameras take very nice video outside in good light. If you are editing or nitpicky, you will note that the SONY and the PANASONIC take 60 frames per second, which is somewhat easier to edit, than the 24 frames per second that the CANON records. While you have to look for it, the CANON's outside video does have a couple of instances where it seems to be a tad jerky compared to the SONY and PANASONIC's video. But you really have to look for it and most people won't notice if you don't have another video outside for comparison.

While all the outdoor video is close, I would give the edge to the SONY in video, with the PANASONIC second and the CANON third. But they are close for outside video.

VIDEO INSIDE

Taking video inside is a different story. Inside, the SONY shines and clearly has the best video. The video from this camera is actually good. It is not professional level by any stretch, but it is good solid quite viewable video from a camera that takes still pictures.

There is a noticeable difference on indoor video between the SONY and the PANASONIC. This difference was perhaps most noticeable to me because I had both videos from both cameras and watched them over and over again looking for differences. While the difference is noticeable, it is not a tremendous difference. The SONY video is super smooth and seems to get as much out of the light as it can. The PANASONIC video also is smooth and gets a good contrast tone and color out of the available light, but is slightly less smooth than the SONY. The PANASONIC video is still very viewable and looks good, but not as good as the SONY.

The CANON will take decent indoor video in good light, but in poor light, it just seems to struggle. The CANON's video had many shadows and dark areas that simply were not present in the SONY and PANASONIC videos. I did not notice any hissing in the CANON video as some of the other reviewers have mentioned. This may be an issue that varies from camera to camera.

HANDLING AND SPEED

This was a fairly subjective comparison between the three cameras as to how they felt in the hand and how quickly the camera did what I wanted it to do because if the camera doesn't take the shot when you want to, it doesn't really matter how sharp the picture or video might be.

Based on my experience, the PANASONIC had the best handling of the three. While the PANASONIC and the SONY were both quick to take a picture, for some reason the SONY that I had would take a much longer time (seconds) to record the picture onto the card. This was despite the fact that both cameras had comparable cards with comparable write speeds. Both the SONY and the PANASONIC had rather quick autofocus which also made them seem to react faster. The PANASONIC is noticeably thinner and lighter than the SONY while maintaining a similar full raised rubber grip on the front which made the camera easier to handle. While both the SONY and the PANASONIC were quick, the blazingly fast (by comparison) write speeds on the PANASONIC compared with its almost non-existent shutter lag made this the best handling camera of the three by far.

Even though it consistently took the best pictures, the CANON was the worst handling camera. The autofocus often had issues focusing and there was a constant shutter lag while it was searching for its focus. We did miss some shots because the CANON was so slow to react. Also, the CANON is somewhere in weight between the SONY and the PANASONIC, but has the worst grip of the three. That little rubber strip on the front is not as effective a grip as the fuller grip that appears on the SONY and the PANASONIC.

With respect to handling, I've read many reviews and each of them seems to state different things about each of the cameras. Many of these reviews seem to indicate that the SONY is a very fast camera, and that might be the case, but the write speed of the 18 MP pictures (which are 50% larger than the CANON's photos and almost the same for the PANASONIC) was so slow, it was distracting and detracted from the experience of using the camera.

VERDICT AND CONCLUSIONS

None of these cameras is the best at everything. The CANON has the best pictures, but is slow to focus, somewhat awkward to handle and has the worst video of the three. The SONY handles okay but is heavy and has noticeably slow write speeds, its picture quality varies greatly with the light (and will deteriorate rapidly with any significant cropping) but the SONY has the best video, and it is noticeable.

In the end I decided to go with the PANASONIC. While it only was the best in handling, to me that was a significant portion of the photographic experience. It is not DSLR fast (instantaneous), but it is a zippy camera for a superzoom, is light in weight and has a good grip which makes it easier to hold. Also, it does not have a pop-up flash which I found always seemed to come up under my fingers where I was holding the left side camera. As noted above, the PANASONIC's videos were good, perhaps not as good as the SONY, but the PANASONIC was certainly capable of capturing some nice video, even in low light. The photos also were not as good as the CANON's, but they were close and very close in low light. With respect to the vibrancy of the colors, if you set the photo vibrancy on the PANASONIC to "happy" (which I guess is their "vivid") it is less of a noticeable difference. The photos look very nice and certainly are competitive in quality for this type of camera.

Hopefully this comparison and these observations will help you decide between these three similar cameras so you can choose the best one for your needs. Good luck.

I had the original ZS-3 which served me well until it broke down. I purchased the ZS-10 and was disappointed with the low-light performance to the extent of returning it. The ZS-20 is a major improvement over the ZS-10.

I have taken only 100-200 pictures but the low light performance is much better and comparable (or slightly better) to the ZS-3. I don't have hands on experience with the other supercompacts but the panasonic worked well for my needs

Pro's

-The Zoom is phenomenal (but comparable to other super compact out there)

AF speed is very good.

Low light performance is ok (major improvement but still just ok)

Flash works surprisingly well to improve overall picture quality

Small, easy to carry around

Same battery as previous model, so if upgrading, you can re-use old peripherals

Con's

Menus could be better, 2-3 clicks to get somewhere, too many buttons and dials *** see update below

Touch screen is confusing unclear when it's used vs. the navigation buttons *** See update below

Preliminary but I feel that the OS can do a better job. Might be because of the extended zoom

Overall

Great compact superzoom, small, light and produce great pictures. Does well what its intended to do.

UPDATE: April 9

Learning curve for touch screen is faster than I originally felt

Video looks great at good light, low light performance for video is not great compared to my panasonic camcoder

HDR works great with minor caveat do not shoot moving objects as the processing gets confused and the blended picture includes multiple fragments of the moving object (in my case kids). I believe this is an issue on all HDR's general recommendation, always take an extra pic on no HDR since a garbled HDR picture is useless

Macro works great

I played with custom setting on the dial which mitigates the multiple switches and dials this to some extend. For example, relatively easy managed to setup custom scene for HDR so to switch from HDR to iA is just a turn of dial

Still very positive on the camera, great buy. Easily fits into my pocket

UPDATE: April 22

Zooming on video adds a slight humm noise to the soundtrack

Touch screen is great! I love the fact that you can just touch the specific object you want to focus on and have the camera focus on it and immediately take a picture. No more half way press, turn and then full press to "tell" the camera where to focus

Buy Panasonic Lumix ZS20 14.1 MP High Sensitivity MOS Digital Camera with 20x Optical Zoom (Black) Now

I tried the models that directly compete with this camera from Canon, Sony, and Nikon and much to my surprise, overall, this camera was superior in almost all areas that matter most to me. That would be the quality and flexibility of the video, the quality of the optical image stabilization, and the overall quality of the still pictures it takes. I didn't care about the GPS as it is largely a gimmick in my opinion and all the major competitors have it now or they feel they won't be able to compete.

You should realize that the GPS built into this camera (and most cameras) is NOT the same GPS you may be used to in your car or smart phone. It does not have detailed maps, does not have a large database of places or landmarks, and is not as accurate. It is basically for tagging your photos and videos with the latitude and longitude of where you took the image so you don't have to take notes manually to sort out what you shot and where later. That's why I consider it largely a gimmick.

Briefly then, this camera had by far, the best video quality and flexibility. You can select AVCHD video in several quality levels including full HD at 1920 x 1080 @ 60 fps (if your computer can handle it--many can't), MP4 video in several quality settings including full HD 1920 x 1080 @ 30 fps, and even a (not too useful) 320 x 240 setting for high-speed video at 240 fps.

FOR TECHIES ONLY: Note that most of these video settings output progressive video but one of them outputs interlaced (can't remember which AVCHD setting). This makes me suspicious that the internal video circuitry may be interlaced and not progressive and they simply convert (deinterlace) the video when they create the progressive video file on the memory card. I could not find confirmation on this anywhere and calling Panasonic support is utterly useless for something this technical--they just aren't trained to know such things. I must say though that I didn't notice any interlaced artifacts or sharpness/quality issues with the video so I'm satisfied with the video either way.

The optical image stabilization is absolutely amazing and was so far superior to the Nikon for example, that I had to keep checking that I actually had the image stabilization in the Nikon turned on! You can literally hand-hold the camera at full 20x zoom (being very deliberate and careful) and shoot acceptable video, which is almost unheard of in a small camera like this.

The still images are very high quality and have relatively low noise for a camera that has this many pixels in the sensor. Most consumers don't realize that it's mostly the marketing departments that want to keep pushing the number of pixels in these small cameras. The engineers know that when you put this many pixels on a small sensor, you get more noise artifacts and you can do only so much about that. This camera is no different in that regard than all the others that are 14 or higher megapixels, regardless of what they claim in their marketing hype.

And the final selling point over some of the competitors for me was that this camera, even with all its consumer "presets" to make this a "point-and-shoot" camera (actually almost too many--confusing!) still has FULL MANUAL CONTROLS and aperture or shutter priority settings for "real" photographers.

Note that like most other pocket cameras, this one does not support RAW files but that's not what it is intended for. Furthermore, with single images files as large as almost 13 MB in size from the 14.1 megapixel sensor, you have more than enough pixels to do some serious Photoshop work even without having RAW files to work with.

This will now be my "take everywhere" camera when I don't need to do "serious" photography and don't want to lug around my full sized Canon DSLR and lenses.

Read Best Reviews of Panasonic Lumix ZS20 14.1 MP High Sensitivity MOS Digital Camera with 20x Optical Zoom (Black) Here

Where do I start? The features on this camera are amazing. The burst shooting modes, the 1080p video, the 20x zoom, the manual controls, scene modes, handling, and menus, are stunning and as close to perfect as you can get at any price point for a camera that easily fits into a pocket. This camera seemed a bargain for the features.

So why two stars? Poor picture quality. I have a camera with $400-camera features and $125-camera photo quality. Maybe I got a bad copy, but I'm reading other reviews saying the same thing so either production isn't consistent or perhaps some people are less discerning regarding photo quality. Several professional reviews (CNET, digitalcamerainfo, and others) have stated that though this model is vastly improved over the previous top of the line Panasonic compact offering it is still sub-par. The guy from CNET said that "Depending on what your plans are for its photos, the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20's shots are either very good to excellent or unusable". I have to agree. If you never plan on going bigger than 4x6 or maybe 5x7s you'll probably be fine. Comparing the photos from my five-year old Kodak Easyshare C875 showed only marginal improvements in some pictures, but most were about the same some were worse and the colors seemed washed out and duller than reality. The softness and noise of the photos is noticeable upon close inspection even at regular viewing sizes. Oh, and yes, I did the half-press to allow the camera to focus so that's not the problem.

Using the "Intelligent Auto" feature was frustrating at best. Images rarely turned out nicely and I constantly found myself going into the manual modes to try to make the camera take a better picture. As a father my primary purpose for this camera was taking photos of the kids. When they're doing something cute or funny I don't want to mess around with settings. I want to turn the camera on and capture the moment. With this camera many moments were lost. Also, I had many images blurred from movement while using the intelligent auto mode and I would think a truly intelligent auto should adjust shutter speed for detected motion. The camera seemed to do okay when shooting subjects without a lot of detail and that were not moving.

Then there are the burst pictures. The concept is great, but usually people using this feature would be using them in action-type shots. Unfortunately the intelligent auto feature doesn't know how to handle this and the pictures all turned out blurry. All even with the "Motion Deblur" on and the "iHDR" turned off. Trust me I monkeyed and monkeyed with this thing to figure out what I was doing wrong. In the end I had to conclude it was the camera. The other problem with the burst mode is that, while the 2AF and 5AF photos were okay (though still sub-par), the 10, 40, and 60 fps shots looked like something taken with a prehistoric first-generation cell-phone camera. Horrible and unusable for anything other than having. Even the manual mode shots were mostly unusable at 10, 40, and 60fps.

Other quibbles are the FLIMSY battery/SD door and the weird crunching sound from the lens when adjusting zoom though they're definitely not deal-breakers.

Some Amazon reviewers have loved this camera. One said they dropped it from a five-story building and it survived. Impressive. Others have said they're seeing near DSLR quality photos. Good for them. Me? I took well over a thousand pictures with this camera and spent hours adjusting settings to no avail. I'm sending mine back and looking for a different model. Though I'd like to give a different ZS20 another chance in hopes of achieving the type of success some reviewers here at Amazon are claiming, I really think these sorts of quality control issues are unacceptable in 2012. I'm not even sure mine is an isolated incident considering the comments from professional camera reviewing websites. A camera can have all the greatest features but if it can't deliver beautiful photos what good are the features? I was mostly happy with the photos from my five-year old 8MP Kodak C875 so I don't think I'm being too picky. I expected better quality than my C875 what I got I'm not sure is even up to the level of the C875.

By the way, I'm seeing on camera forums that Panasonic is rushing out a firmware update to improve the ZS20 photo-quality. It's not out yet, and it may just be a rumor, but keep on the lookout. While it's too late for me as mine is going back, maybe it will be useful for you.

UPDATE: The Panasonic Firmware update for improving night handheld shots is here:

Want Panasonic Lumix ZS20 14.1 MP High Sensitivity MOS Digital Camera with 20x Optical Zoom (Black) Discount?

Just got this camera, and have owned its three previous models. One thing for all to note if you are familiar with this series is that the battery must now be charged in camera with a short USB cable to a Panasonic wall charger. For me, this is a disadvantage, since I have enjoyed the flexibility of the previous arrangement -a dedicated charger into which the battery is placed outside of the camera. I found this "old" setup to be more convenient and easier to use when traveling, and easier to pack. Maybe this is not a problem for you, but it was an unpleasant surprise for me. As others have noted, though, the old charger works with this battery (same battery as before), so you can easily purchase a stand-alone charger.

Update 4-6-12

I have now taken some representative shots with the camera and have some observations. Like the previous three models, the display on this one is not ideal in bright sunlight, although it is acceptable. To my eye, the photos are really good for the category, and an improvement on the previous models. Having the extra zoom is quite nice. I have always enjoyed the Lumix menu system, which is fairly intuitive in this segment.

Since many of you are interested in the low light issues, I have taken some extremely low light shots and looked at them closely after enlarging. I find them quite good, and remarkable with a small sensor. I took a shot today, in one of our classrooms with no lights on, only illumination from an outside door half panel over 50 feet away. I cannot imagine better results with a camera this size with such challenging light.

I also took some photos outside with both bright sunlight and deep shadows in the shot. The photos were excellent, rendering detail in both the sunlit elements (as expected) and in the deep, dark shadows (pleasant surprise).

I have not made use of the touchscreen features yet, so I cannot comment on their usefulness. I assume they will be helpful in some situations.

All in all, this is an nice update to the previous models and I am sure will serve me well in my travels. It remains easily pocketable, easy to use and full of features to experiment with and explore. The compromises are few and the benefits are many.

Save 11% Off

Read More >>

USB Supermini Keyboad Touch Pad Black with built-in

This is not an item that the average person would probably have any real use for, but for some purposes it's indispensable. In my situation I have to support touchscreen PC's that don't have a keyboard or mouse attached, and there are times when a keyboard and mouse are necessary. Rather than carrying around a full sized keyboard and a mouse, and not having a place to set either of them down while using the other (and how do you use a mouse against cinderblock walls if there's no table?), you can hold this in one hand while the other one types on the keys or uses the built-in mouse touchpad. The keys are really small, too tiny for touch-typing but then you won't want this for word processing anyhow.

It's only about 8 inches wide and 6 inches front to back and maybe 5/8" thick; it has a decently long cord attached. (So many items and appliances are ruined by the mfr saving two cents and providing too-short of a cord this one is better.) If you need to have a keyboard and mouse for a computer where there is little space, or where those things are not able to be used conveniently, this is a godsend. Possibly there could be some handicapped persons who would also benefit from a device this small that provides both the keyboard and mouse.

If I have any gripes about this little mini keyboard it is that you have to make sure the num lock hasn't engaged, because if it does, some of the keys revert to typing numbers instead of regular characters as it turns some of the keys into a numeric keypad arrangement, but you get used to watching for this and avoiding it.

You might also find this useful if you have a 'utility' pc tucked away as a file server, which does not usually need a keyboard and mouse left lying around. You plug this in to the USB port, Windows installs it promptly, and voila, you have a keyboard and mouse.

Someone apparently thought my little mini keyboard was pretty cute and walked off with it and I had to buy another one immediately, because for my purposes, there's nothing else like it. I showed the vendor who provides the touch screen PC's and he bought some for his employees to use, and they found out just how handy this is.

It's well made, or so it seems, much like any typical computer keyboard only smaller. If you need a mouse and keyboard in a pinch, and don't have space or place to put the regular items, this is perfect.

This thing is tiny. It's pretty tough to do touch typing on it as the keys are very small and close together. But it's absolutely perfect for my needs I use it as a keyboard for a Linux server machine when I need to log in directly to the console instead of using ssh or a remote desktop. I don't need to do this often, so I didn't want to invest in a KVM switch to share with my main desktop machine, since KVM's are often temperamental. So, since my monitor has two video inputs, I can now just switch monitor inputs and bring out this little keyboard/touch pad combo that stays plugged into the Linux machine and fits easily on top of the case when not in use.

I could also see people using this as a portable keyboard for logging into servers, kiosks, HTPCs and other types of systems without real keyboards/mice. I haven't tried it with my PS3 yet but I'm sure it would work for that also.

Overall it's perfect for me, but if you have larger hands (or even normal-sized hands) I doubt you'll be pleased with the touch typing performance of this keyboard.

Buy USB Supermini Keyboad Touch Pad Black with built-in Now

This keyboard is perfect for my samsung slate series 7.

It is small and functional and a great addition to my windows tablet when I'm all about writing :)

-And yes, the mouse pad works as it is supposed to!

Read Best Reviews of USB Supermini Keyboad Touch Pad Black with built-in Here

I use this keyboard on a lap desk while sitting in my easy chair. It is perfect for that purpose. Yes, it is small, but it works very well. It is a little smaller than the keyboard on my 10" netbook but it still works fine with my large hands. The touchpad is very useful and performs various touch commands flawlessly. The keyboard is very quiet, too. My only complaint is the mouse buttons and their placement and the buttons themselves. The buttons are crammed under the touchpad and they are easy to miss. They need direct, firm pressure to execute commands properly.

The keyboard's feet grip smooth surfaces very well. I can tilt my lap desk at a 45° angle and it won't slip off. The unit is very well made and has a solid feel. I highly recommend this keyboard to anyone seeking a small format and minimal footprint.

Want USB Supermini Keyboad Touch Pad Black with built-in Discount?

Read More >>

Gateway ZX6980-UR328 All-in-One Touch Desktop PC

Pros:

This computer is no bad at all. Fast, good with multitasking and quiet at night. Front display panel looks like iPad. I loaded MS Office 2010 on it with no issues. Then I loaded other third party programs and still not bad.....Windows 8 is actually very cool. You can still use Windows 7 Desktop interface if you want to and invoke DOS prompt if you are a geek like me. The PC has USB 2.0,3.0 ports and HDMI. It has DVD burner as well. Wireless is built in. 10 points multi-touch has kids screaming with joy when they play cut the rope. Display is amazing. Getting better download throughput on Verizon FIOS with this PC, wonder why....

Cons:

Keyboard feels cheap. Tiny wireless receiver for wireless mouse and keyboard was packaged inside of the mouse. It took me 20 min to find it. :-), but it is probably me....

I received my Gateway all-in-one desktop a couple of days ago (through another seller). It was manufacturer refurbished and came with no quick guide. While the PC was everything I expected and much more, the lack of installation guide almost ruined the whole system. I was impressed with less cables tangling under my desk, though I still have my old Windows Vista Jurassic at the other end of the room that served me well for 5 years. This PC identified and connected to my WiFi instantly. The display is dazzling with the brightness. Then I got to the wireless mouse and keyboard, and my nightmare began in earnest. I installed the batteries in both of them. They both would not work. After 3 hours of fruitless efforts and a couple of emails to the seller (waiting for the response), I finally located a wifi adapter hidden inside the mouse cover, to my dismay. That was after I have screwed up all the configurations inside the PC in all the efforts to troubleshoot. Then back to undo all the crap that I had caused myself by a reset. A simple quick guide could have saved me the migraine. Now the mouse, the keyboard and the entire system work just as expected and more. The installed windows 8 and the touch screen are very exciting and amazing.

Update: 4/27/13

This machine is going strong by the day. I had a minor scare 2 days. This is the story. I was uploading my updated website to the remote server and the system was going to 10 hours to complete the upload. The machine was literally at a crawl. I just could not upload to the server even after 3 attempts. Come to finally discover that to upload unto the server you may need to either stop other programs that are running or video streaming. Or you may need to just upload the only section of the website that is edited instead of the whole website contents, like I always do. Once I figured this out, my system is back to its old self. Now I can upload as fast as it comes. I love this machine....

Buy Gateway ZX6980-UR328 All-in-One Touch Desktop PC Now

best bang for he buck ! this compact design was by far the best priced I found anywhere. it is really fast. the only issue I have with it, is navigating the new email from windows 8.

Read Best Reviews of Gateway ZX6980-UR328 All-in-One Touch Desktop PC Here

I researched a ton of possibilities. But this price was right and considering I was replacing a 10-yr. old Gateway Windows XP which is still being used by a friend, I decided on the Gateway. Windows 8 has proved to be no problem and works well with the touch screen. My one complaint was that it had no Freecell loaded but took care of that easily. The 23 inch screen is a real joy. I also kept my Logitach backlit keyboard instead of the one provided. Just a matter of personal preferencee and ease of use. Kept theirs as a backup in case I spill coffee again...

Want Gateway ZX6980-UR328 All-in-One Touch Desktop PC Discount?

Purchased this to replace a slow, old dinosaur computer and love it. Love the touchscreen and the ability to switch to regular desktop. No problems at all with this computer. Completely happy with my purchase

Save 14% Off

Read More >>

2500mAh Extended Battery fits HP iPAQ hw6500, hw6515, hw6700, hw6900, hw6915, hw6925, hw6515a, iPAQ

I bought this 2500mAH battery since my original battery that came along with the phone didn't last for any more than 30 mintues after 3 years of usage. Now, I get around 6 hours of talk time with occassional GPRS usage (about 20 minutes per day). I waited a while before posting this review to ensure that I have had atleast 3 full charge cycles of the battery done. It seems to be consistent. I would recommend it.

Prompt delivery, excellent product, reasonably good package, but postage cost outside USA horrible, overall Excellent value for money, I would recommend buying from this seller!

Buy 2500mAh Extended Battery fits HP iPAQ hw6500, hw6515, hw6700, hw6900, hw6915, hw6925, hw6515a, iPAQ Now

The first time I tried to charge it, the battery was temperamental unless positioned just so...then it worked o.k. until the phone was dropped last Thursday and the battery has been dead, non-functioning, ever since. Fortunately I kept the old battery and the phone is working fine with the old battery. I need a new battery but would not try this manufacturer again.

Read Best Reviews of 2500mAh Extended Battery fits HP iPAQ hw6500, hw6515, hw6700, hw6900, hw6915, hw6925, hw6515a, iPAQ Here

I followed all the good conditioning practices. Service life was at least 2yrs, a charge lasting 3-5 days. The only issue was with the fit/design of the cover often causing the phone to turn off completely. I would purchase again.

Want 2500mAh Extended Battery fits HP iPAQ hw6500, hw6515, hw6700, hw6900, hw6915, hw6925, hw6515a, iPAQ Discount?

Read More >>

PDair Leather case for Sony VAIO P Series - Book Type (Black)

Better than perfect. The item arrived well before I had expected it to, the quality of the supply was just as I expected it to be. I am most pleased, I would recommend anyone to purchase from this supplier any time.

Read More >>

PalmOne i705 Wireless Handheld

This is an early look at the i705, which I have only used for a short time so far (I have been fortunate to receive a loaner, but haven't purchased one yet). If you need a primer on why a basic Palm is useful, check out reviews of some low-end models (I own and reviewed the Vx). The i705's form factor is good certainly less bulky than its predecessor VII and just a tad thicker than the sleek V model or m500. It feels fine in my hands. The built in wireless antenna is not obtrusive in the least and frankly, adds some style to what has been a fairly mundane look for most Palm devices. You still subscribe to the Palm.net service on which the ill-fated Palm VII operated. But it runs on the same network (Mobitex) as RIM's Blackberry, so reliability/consistency of access should be as high as that device. So far, access has been fairly quick and readily accessible. You can set the wireless capability to either an "always on" setting or one in which it will only receive/download emails during a desired time period (though you can set a new email alert to run 24/7). It also natively supports AOL Instant Messenger, which is nice I've IM'd a few times and it works, though it's not as quick as your desktop. Battery life is good, even with the device set to its "always on" mode others who have had the device longer indicate that it's still good for a week with pretty heavy usage and longer if you turn it off overnight. The expansion slot is long overdue. Many enhanced applications are conveniently preloaded my personal favorites include AvantGo and DataViz, though the Palm Reader should be increasingly valuable over time. I'm wondering if the 8 meg memory will be enough over time, given the multiple data-heavy applications this device is designed to address. However, I've only filled about 1 meg in my Vx with about 18 months worth of usage. So, 8 megs, plus extra strorage capacity through the expansion slot, would seem to be sufficient. I've tried the keyboard takes some getting used to, but should be faster than graffiti for instant messaging/email. Pricing of the service is very attractive. It's priced per kilobyte. I'd blow off the low-end plan ($$$.../mo. for 100kb). That's only going to get you maybe 40 text emails. Go with the $$$.../mo unlimited kb plan, prepaid for a year, once you're sure you'll keep it.

The one nagging issue for me with all Palm devices is the rigid interaction with the stylus. It has always been awkward to draw the stylus out of its holster (you have to use your thumbnail) and if you don't click it in all the way when you're done, it's still loose enough that it will fall out. Of course, it has never been comfortable to use either. The Handspring Visor's stylus glides in and out effortlessly and the slightly fatter head makes control of it much easier. Too bad Palm is still making otherwise functional devices with this deficiency.

So, the good news is that with this device, Palm has finally gotten over the hump of just being a scheduler/organizer. I think this device may finally allow Palm to become more standardized in corporations and it will definitely be attractive to high-end consumers. Unfortunately, the power applications for this device are yet to come. You cannot download email attachments yet (that will come in the May/June time frame). It will also not be voice-enabled (GPRS) until the Fall, so the Handspring Treo, despite its bulkiness, is about the best combined solution right now. And Palm seems non-committal on when it will offer a color version, which I think is a near-necessity if you're going to surf the Web or read Excel, PowerPoint and Acrobat attachments. In the end, it's a great improvement over what Palm offers today. But I think it would make sense to wait until some of the features mentioned above become available.

As a blackberry user for over a year and a half and a hard-core Palm junkie, I was eager to have a shot at carrying an all-in-one device rather than two devices which don't talk to each other. Plus, for the same price, the Palm.net service offers more (web clipping and web browsing without usage quota) than just always-on email.

I have been very pleased with the device itself in the month plus I've used it. It has the merely adequate grayscale palm display we're all used to by now, but rewards you with phenomenal battery life (20 minutes on the cradle a day keep it charged, even with wireless usage) and an eminently light and pocketable form factor. It is really quite amazing what they fit into such a slim little package, with an SD/MMC slot to boot!

If you haven't used a wireless device like a blackberry, you really don't know what you're missing. Instead of having to take time out of your routine to check your email a dozen times to see if an important message came through, you just go about your business until you either get beeped, buzzed, or flashed (your choice of nothing or any combo of the three). During a heated game of scrabble, just fire up the 705 with the Merriam Webster PQA (a sort of web shortcut to their site which avoids slow graphics/ads....see palm.com for details) and use their dictionary, which is far larger than what will fit on any PDA, to solve the dispute. Wondering what the population of Brazil is? Go to brittanica.com with their PQA and have the answer in 30 seconds. It makes firing a computer up seem like a waste of time.

The main shortcomings of the device center around the screen, but the battery life vs. full-time sidelit screen (like the Clie 760c) debate has been beaten to death. But the bottom line is that until the battery and screen technology progresses further (the organic LEDs, perhaps?), you're not going to have a wireless PDA and a dynamite screen in this kind of form factor. And I really don't think that I could go back to a Clie after getting used to full-time wireless access.

The other issue is that of the network the device uses. While the Mobitex network doesn't set any speed records, it is a) fairly responsive, b) rock-solid reliable (Sept. 11 didn't cause so much of a hiccough in the NYC area network), c) has better coverage than GPRS or 3G will have for quite a while to come. And since Voicestream's throughput-based data fees are not attractive (what's the fun of a wireless toy if you've got to watch the clock?) to the average user, Mobitex wins in my mind.

Buy PalmOne i705 Wireless Handheld Now

I have been very happy with my i705 and agree for the most part with the other reviewers. The form factor is quite fine, and the device seems to be (so far) very dependable. If you need wireless web or e-mail capability, the i705 is a bargain at its price.

The biggest single problem with the i705, in my opinion, is the rather pricey PalmNet service that you must subscribe to if you wish to take advantage of its wireless capabilities. Palm's "associate plan" is for all practical purposes a joke and if you get more than ten e-mails per month it's not worth the money. Unlimited service costs considerably more and if you're a heavy e-mail user, it might be worth the cost. Personally, I think it is not.

The i705 is a quality product and in my opinion is infinitely more dependable than the M500 I owned before it, but unless you really need wireless capability, live in an area covered by PalmNet, and don't mind being gouged by their obscenely high subscription rates, I'd pass on this one.

Read Best Reviews of PalmOne i705 Wireless Handheld Here

As a New York Criminal and Divorce attorney, I swear the 1-705 is

guilty of being the best friend you can have out there in the field. The ability to read Excel & Word docs is a godsend, and between the power to remote access the internet, and the freebie downloads available for a palm, who needs a laptop? This beauty and a cell phone, and you've got all the equipment you need to be a successful road warrior. You are hereby summoned to appear with your i-705 and run your business on the run.

Want PalmOne i705 Wireless Handheld Discount?

Being a user of the VIIx, I anxiously awaited the arrival of the i705. I am not in any way disappointed.

The 705 has all of the usual stuff we have come to expect from Palm OS devices: easy to use, fairly good battery life, and loads of add-on software. The only real objection is that you really can't visit web pages with the Palm...you need to use the Web Clipping apps which are a good substitute IF the site/service you want provides a clipping app. The vast majority of them do, so don't worry. A color display would have also been nice, but the drain on the battery would have been too great.

The addition of the blink/buzz notification of incoming mail is useful and the SD slot is a godsend. The processor seems to be a bit more peppy than in the VII series as well.

No complaints about the wireless service. It works in every city I have been in and even works well in wine country in Northern California and other "rural" areas I've been to. You won't set any speed records but it is bearable.

Outlook users should take care to find software that lets the Palm sync with Outlook for tasks, contacts, and calendar BEFORE using the unit heavily. I can speak from experience that synching a Palm to Outlook after both of them have been used for contact tracking is a royal pain.

Overall, unless you have a deep-seated need to use Pocket PC 2002 the Palm remains the best bang for the buck for wireless handhelds and the best overall solution for a mobile professional. It may be the case that a Pocket PC comes closer to replacing a laptop, but the prices on decent units plus wireless modem plus wireless service puts them on par with a refurbished laptop. The Blackberry is nice, but limited.

Save 17% Off

Read More >>